Re: [patch 34/54] Fix roundup_pow_of_two(1)

2007-06-11 Thread Rolf Eike Beer
Chris Wright wrote: > * Theodore Tso ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > If this doesn't fix a user-visiable bug, should we be including it in > > the stable patch series? (Assuming that it doesn't, I wouldn't, but I > > tend to be more conservative about what I would include in a stable > > production

Re: [patch 34/54] Fix roundup_pow_of_two(1)

2007-06-08 Thread Chris Wright
* Theodore Tso ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > If this doesn't fix a user-visiable bug, should we be including it in > the stable patch series? (Assuming that it doesn't, I wouldn't, but I > tend to be more conservative about what I would include in a stable > production release.) Rolf, despite simp

Re: [patch 34/54] Fix roundup_pow_of_two(1)

2007-06-08 Thread Theodore Tso
On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 12:22:01AM -0700, Chris Wright wrote: > -stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know. > - > > From: Rolf Eike Beer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Fix roundup_pow_of_two(1) > > 1 is a power of two, therefore roundup_pow_of_two(1) sho

[patch 34/54] Fix roundup_pow_of_two(1)

2007-06-08 Thread Chris Wright
-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know. - From: Rolf Eike Beer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Fix roundup_pow_of_two(1) 1 is a power of two, therefore roundup_pow_of_two(1) should return 1. It does in case the argument is a variable but in case it's a co