Re: [patch 4/8] irq code: Add coherence test for PREEMPT_ACTIVE

2005-05-28 Thread Blaisorblade
On Friday 27 May 2005 05:31, Paul Mundt wrote: > On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 03:06:09AM +0200, Blaisorblade wrote: > > On Friday 27 May 2005 02:38, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Ok, a grep shows that possible culprits (i.e. giving success to > > grep GENERIC_HARDIRQS arch/*/Kconfig, and using 0x400

Re: [patch 4/8] irq code: Add coherence test for PREEMPT_ACTIVE

2005-05-28 Thread Blaisorblade
On Friday 27 May 2005 15:33, David Howells wrote: > Blaisorblade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Ok, a grep shows that possible culprits (i.e. giving success to > > grep GENERIC_HARDIRQS arch/*/Kconfig, and using 0x400 as > > PREEMPT_ACTIVE, as given by grep PREEMPT_ACTIVE > > include/asm-*/thre

Re: [patch 4/8] irq code: Add coherence test for PREEMPT_ACTIVE

2005-05-27 Thread David Howells
Blaisorblade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ok, a grep shows that possible culprits (i.e. giving success to > grep GENERIC_HARDIRQS arch/*/Kconfig, and using 0x400 as PREEMPT_ACTIVE, > as given by grep PREEMPT_ACTIVE include/asm-*/thread_info.h) are (at a first > glance): frv, sh, sh64. For F

Re: [patch 4/8] irq code: Add coherence test for PREEMPT_ACTIVE

2005-05-26 Thread Paul Mundt
On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 03:06:09AM +0200, Blaisorblade wrote: > On Friday 27 May 2005 02:38, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > After porting this fixlet to UML: > > > > http://linux.bkbits.net:8080/linux-2.5/[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > , I've also added a warning which should refuse compilation with insan

Re: [patch 4/8] irq code: Add coherence test for PREEMPT_ACTIVE

2005-05-26 Thread Blaisorblade
On Friday 27 May 2005 02:38, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > After porting this fixlet to UML: > > http://linux.bkbits.net:8080/linux-2.5/[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > , I've also added a warning which should refuse compilation with insane > values for PREEMPT_ACTIVE... maybe we should simply move PREEMPT_ACTIV