Re: [patch 43/45] x86: replace LOCK_PREFIX in futex.h

2008-02-08 Thread Chuck Ebbert
On 02/08/2008 01:35 PM, Stefan Lippers-Hollmann wrote: > > This patch seems to break compilation on x86_64 (i386 builds fine). > >> -"2: " LOCK_PREFIX "cmpxchgl %3, %2\n\ >> +"2: "lock cmpxchgl %3, %2\n\ Extra quote, should be: +"2:lock cmpxchgl %3, %2\n\ -- To unsubscribe from this list: s

Re: [patch 43/45] x86: replace LOCK_PREFIX in futex.h

2008-02-08 Thread Greg KH
On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 07:35:33PM +0100, Stefan Lippers-Hollmann wrote: > Hi > > On Donnerstag, 7. Februar 2008, Greg KH wrote: > > 2.6.24-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us > > know. > > > > -- > > From: Thomas Gleixner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >

Re: [patch 43/45] x86: replace LOCK_PREFIX in futex.h

2008-02-08 Thread Stefan Lippers-Hollmann
Hi On Donnerstag, 7. Februar 2008, Greg KH wrote: > 2.6.24-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know. > > -- > From: Thomas Gleixner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > The exception fixup for the futex macros __futex_atomic_op1/2 and > futex_atomic_cmpxchg_inato

[patch 43/45] x86: replace LOCK_PREFIX in futex.h

2008-02-07 Thread Greg KH
2.6.24-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know. -- From: Thomas Gleixner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> The exception fixup for the futex macros __futex_atomic_op1/2 and futex_atomic_cmpxchg_inatomic() is missing an entry when the lock prefix is replaced by a N