On 02/08/2008 01:35 PM, Stefan Lippers-Hollmann wrote:
>
> This patch seems to break compilation on x86_64 (i386 builds fine).
>
>> -"2: " LOCK_PREFIX "cmpxchgl %3, %2\n\
>> +"2: "lock cmpxchgl %3, %2\n\
Extra quote, should be:
+"2:lock cmpxchgl %3, %2\n\
--
To unsubscribe from this list: s
On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 07:35:33PM +0100, Stefan Lippers-Hollmann wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Donnerstag, 7. Februar 2008, Greg KH wrote:
> > 2.6.24-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us
> > know.
> >
> > --
> > From: Thomas Gleixner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
>
Hi
On Donnerstag, 7. Februar 2008, Greg KH wrote:
> 2.6.24-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
>
> --
> From: Thomas Gleixner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> The exception fixup for the futex macros __futex_atomic_op1/2 and
> futex_atomic_cmpxchg_inato
2.6.24-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
--
From: Thomas Gleixner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The exception fixup for the futex macros __futex_atomic_op1/2 and
futex_atomic_cmpxchg_inatomic() is missing an entry when the lock
prefix is replaced by a N
4 matches
Mail list logo