Re: [patch V2 03/10] timers: Rework idle logic

2017-04-21 Thread Frederic Weisbecker
On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 08:50:39AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 01:11:05PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > Storing next event and determining whether the base is idle can be done in > > __next_timer_interrupt(). > > > > Preparatory patch for new call sites which need t

Re: [patch V2 03/10] timers: Rework idle logic

2017-04-18 Thread Peter Zijlstra
On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 01:11:05PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > Storing next event and determining whether the base is idle can be done in > __next_timer_interrupt(). > > Preparatory patch for new call sites which need this information as well. > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner > --- > ker

[patch V2 03/10] timers: Rework idle logic

2017-04-18 Thread Thomas Gleixner
Storing next event and determining whether the base is idle can be done in __next_timer_interrupt(). Preparatory patch for new call sites which need this information as well. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner --- kernel/time/timer.c | 43 --- 1 file chang