Hi Sebastian,
On 07/15/2016 04:10 PM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
* Jacek Anaszewski | 2016-07-14 13:55:26 [+0200]:
On 07/14/2016 01:33 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
That does not explain WHY this needs to happen in the low level bringup phase
of the CPU with interrupts disabled and can't
Hi Sebastian,
On 07/15/2016 04:10 PM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
* Jacek Anaszewski | 2016-07-14 13:55:26 [+0200]:
On 07/14/2016 01:33 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
That does not explain WHY this needs to happen in the low level bringup phase
of the CPU with interrupts disabled and can't
* Jacek Anaszewski | 2016-07-14 13:55:26 [+0200]:
>On 07/14/2016 01:33 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>>That does not explain WHY this needs to happen in the low level bringup phase
>>of the CPU with interrupts disabled and can't be done from the normal ONLINE
>>callbacks in thread context.
>
>It was
* Jacek Anaszewski | 2016-07-14 13:55:26 [+0200]:
>On 07/14/2016 01:33 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>>That does not explain WHY this needs to happen in the low level bringup phase
>>of the CPU with interrupts disabled and can't be done from the normal ONLINE
>>callbacks in thread context.
>
>It was
On 07/14/2016 01:33 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On Thu, 14 Jul 2016, Jacek Anaszewski wrote:
On 07/14/2016 11:41 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 10:10:55AM +0200, Jacek Anaszewski wrote:
On 07/14/2016 09:47 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Jacek Anaszewski
On 07/14/2016 01:33 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On Thu, 14 Jul 2016, Jacek Anaszewski wrote:
On 07/14/2016 11:41 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 10:10:55AM +0200, Jacek Anaszewski wrote:
On 07/14/2016 09:47 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Jacek Anaszewski wrote:
@@ -133,7
On Thu, 14 Jul 2016, Jacek Anaszewski wrote:
> On 07/14/2016 11:41 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 10:10:55AM +0200, Jacek Anaszewski wrote:
> > > On 07/14/2016 09:47 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > >
> > > > * Jacek Anaszewski wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
On Thu, 14 Jul 2016, Jacek Anaszewski wrote:
> On 07/14/2016 11:41 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 10:10:55AM +0200, Jacek Anaszewski wrote:
> > > On 07/14/2016 09:47 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > >
> > > > * Jacek Anaszewski wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > > @@ -133,7 +125,13 @@
On 07/14/2016 11:41 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 10:10:55AM +0200, Jacek Anaszewski wrote:
On 07/14/2016 09:47 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Jacek Anaszewski wrote:
@@ -133,7 +125,13 @@ static int __init ledtrig_cpu_init(void)
}
On 07/14/2016 11:41 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 10:10:55AM +0200, Jacek Anaszewski wrote:
On 07/14/2016 09:47 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Jacek Anaszewski wrote:
@@ -133,7 +125,13 @@ static int __init ledtrig_cpu_init(void)
}
On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 10:10:55AM +0200, Jacek Anaszewski wrote:
> On 07/14/2016 09:47 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> >* Jacek Anaszewski wrote:
> >
> >>>@@ -133,7 +125,13 @@ static int __init ledtrig_cpu_init(void)
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>>
On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 10:10:55AM +0200, Jacek Anaszewski wrote:
> On 07/14/2016 09:47 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> >* Jacek Anaszewski wrote:
> >
> >>>@@ -133,7 +125,13 @@ static int __init ledtrig_cpu_init(void)
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>> register_syscore_ops(_cpu_syscore_ops);
> >>>-
On 07/14/2016 09:47 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Jacek Anaszewski wrote:
@@ -133,7 +125,13 @@ static int __init ledtrig_cpu_init(void)
}
register_syscore_ops(_cpu_syscore_ops);
- register_cpu_notifier(_cpu_nb);
+
+ /*
+ * FIXME: Why needs
On 07/14/2016 09:47 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Jacek Anaszewski wrote:
@@ -133,7 +125,13 @@ static int __init ledtrig_cpu_init(void)
}
register_syscore_ops(_cpu_syscore_ops);
- register_cpu_notifier(_cpu_nb);
+
+ /*
+ * FIXME: Why needs this to happen in the
* Jacek Anaszewski wrote:
> > @@ -133,7 +125,13 @@ static int __init ledtrig_cpu_init(void)
> > }
> >
> > register_syscore_ops(_cpu_syscore_ops);
> > - register_cpu_notifier(_cpu_nb);
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * FIXME: Why needs this to happen in
* Jacek Anaszewski wrote:
> > @@ -133,7 +125,13 @@ static int __init ledtrig_cpu_init(void)
> > }
> >
> > register_syscore_ops(_cpu_syscore_ops);
> > - register_cpu_notifier(_cpu_nb);
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * FIXME: Why needs this to happen in the interrupt disabled
> > +
Hi Anna,
On 07/13/2016 07:16 PM, Anna-Maria Gleixner wrote:
> Original Message
> Subject: [patch V2 43/67] leds/trigger/cpu: Convert to hotplug state
machine
> Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2016 17:16:45 +
> From: Anna-Maria Gleixner <anna-ma...@linutronix.de>
Hi Anna,
On 07/13/2016 07:16 PM, Anna-Maria Gleixner wrote:
> Original Message
> Subject: [patch V2 43/67] leds/trigger/cpu: Convert to hotplug state
machine
> Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2016 17:16:45 +
> From: Anna-Maria Gleixner
> To: LKML
> CC: Peter Zijl
From: Richard Cochran
This is a straightforward conversion. We place this callback last
in the list so that the LED illuminates only after a successful
bring up sequence.
Signed-off-by: Richard Cochran
Reviewed-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
From: Richard Cochran
This is a straightforward conversion. We place this callback last
in the list so that the LED illuminates only after a successful
bring up sequence.
Signed-off-by: Richard Cochran
Reviewed-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
Cc: Jacek Anaszewski
Cc: Linus Torvalds
Cc: Linus
20 matches
Mail list logo