Alexandre Chartre writes:
> On 5/5/20 3:53 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> +__this_cpu_add(irq_count, 1); \
>> +asm volatile( \
>> +"pushq %%rbp \n" \
>> +
On 5/5/20 3:53 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
Device interrupt handlers and system vector handlers are executed on the
interrupt stack. The stack switch happens in the low level assembly entry
code. This conflicts with the efforts to consolidate the exit code in C to
ensure correctness vs. RCU and
On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 10:19 PM Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>
> Device interrupt handlers and system vector handlers are executed on the
> interrupt stack. The stack switch happens in the low level assembly entry
> code. This conflicts with the efforts to consolidate the exit code in C to
> ensure corr
Thomas Gleixner writes:
> That also allows to move the xen hypercall extra magic code and the softirq
> stack switching into C.
>
> The mechanism is straight forward:
>
> 1) Store the current stack pointer on top of the interrupt stack. That's
> required for the unwinder.
>
> 2) Switch t
Device interrupt handlers and system vector handlers are executed on the
interrupt stack. The stack switch happens in the low level assembly entry
code. This conflicts with the efforts to consolidate the exit code in C to
ensure correctness vs. RCU and tracing.
As there is no way to move #DB away
5 matches
Mail list logo
