Hi all.
> >
> > config CC_SUPPORTS_STACKPROTECTOR_STRONG
> > bool
> > option exec="$CC -fstack-protector-strong -c empty.c"
> >
> > or something like that. No?
>
> This is an implementation detail, but the original patch expected the
> result to be 'y' or 'n' (or empty=='n') on st
Linus, All,
On 2014-01-01 11:33 -0800, Linus Torvalds spake thusly:
> On Wed, Jan 1, 2014 at 3:42 AM, Yann E. MORIN wrote:
> >
> > On 2013-12-31 16:16 -0800, Linus Torvalds spake thusly:
> >>
> >> What we really really want to do is to have some way to add config
> >> options based on shell scrip
On 01/01/2014 11:33 AM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> Ack. Looks good to me. I've wanted this for a long time for other
> reasons, we should finally just do it.
>
Yes, we keep avoiding doing this by layering hack upon hack, but
really... it needs to be done.
The chief objection I've heard is that i
On Wed, Jan 1, 2014 at 3:42 AM, Yann E. MORIN wrote:
>
> On 2013-12-31 16:16 -0800, Linus Torvalds spake thusly:
>>
>> What we really really want to do is to have some way to add config
>> options based on shell scripts and compiler support. That would also
>> get rid of a lot of Makefile trickery
Linus, All,
On 2013-12-31 16:16 -0800, Linus Torvalds spake thusly:
> On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 4:45 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
> >
> > NAK. If you have selected CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR_STRONG, the build
> > the fail hard. Without this, it means you'll end up with kernels that
> > build and show a stack
On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 4:45 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
>
> NAK. If you have selected CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR_STRONG, the build
> the fail hard. Without this, it means you'll end up with kernels that
> build and show a stackprotector option in their config, which is
> false.
What we really really want
On 12/30/2013 1:37 PM, David Rientjes wrote:
8779657d29c0 ("stackprotector: Introduce CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR_STRONG")
causes the build to break when the compiler doesn't support
-fstack-protector-strong:
cc1: error: unrecognized command line option ‘-fstack-protector-strong’
cc
On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 1:37 PM, David Rientjes wrote:
> 8779657d29c0 ("stackprotector: Introduce CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR_STRONG")
> causes the build to break when the compiler doesn't support
> -fstack-protector-strong:
>
> cc1: error: unrecognized command line option
> ‘-fstack-protect
8779657d29c0 ("stackprotector: Introduce CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR_STRONG")
causes the build to break when the compiler doesn't support
-fstack-protector-strong:
cc1: error: unrecognized command line option ‘-fstack-protector-strong’
cc1: error: unrecognized command line option ‘-
9 matches
Mail list logo
