Re: [patch ide-dev 3/9] merge LBA28 and LBA48 Host Protected Area support code

2005-02-25 Thread Greg Freemyer
Retested with Hitachi drive and 2.6.10 vanilla kernel. Same behavior, HPA is not reset to native max. Greg -- Greg Freemyer On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 15:19:52 -0500, Greg Freemyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 17:30:55 +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Re: [patch ide-dev 3/9] merge LBA28 and LBA48 Host Protected Area support code

2005-02-25 Thread Greg Freemyer
Retested with Hitachi drive and 2.6.10 vanilla kernel. Same behavior, HPA is not reset to native max. Greg -- Greg Freemyer On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 15:19:52 -0500, Greg Freemyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 17:30:55 +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On

Re: [patch ide-dev 3/9] merge LBA28 and LBA48 Host Protected Area support code

2005-02-24 Thread Greg Freemyer
On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 17:30:55 +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thursday 24 February 2005 17:10, Greg Freemyer wrote: > > I have generic question about HPA, not the patch. > > > > I have noticed with a SUSE 2.6.8 vendor kernel, the HPA behavior is > > not consistent.

Re: [patch ide-dev 3/9] merge LBA28 and LBA48 Host Protected Area support code

2005-02-24 Thread Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
On Thursday 24 February 2005 17:10, Greg Freemyer wrote: > I have generic question about HPA, not the patch. > > I have noticed with a SUSE 2.6.8 vendor kernel, the HPA behavior is > not consistent. Please retry with vanilla kernel. > ie. With exactly the same computer/controller, but with

Re: [patch ide-dev 3/9] merge LBA28 and LBA48 Host Protected Area support code

2005-02-24 Thread Greg Freemyer
I have generic question about HPA, not the patch. I have noticed with a SUSE 2.6.8 vendor kernel, the HPA behavior is not consistent. ie. With exactly the same computer/controller, but with different disk drives (models/manufacturers) the HPA behavior varies. In all my testing the HPA was

[patch ide-dev 3/9] merge LBA28 and LBA48 Host Protected Area support code

2005-02-24 Thread Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
* merge idedisk_read_native_max_address() and idedisk_read_native_max_address_ext() * merge idedisk_set_max_address() and idedisk_set_max_address_ext() diff -Nru a/drivers/ide/ide-disk.c b/drivers/ide/ide-disk.c --- a/drivers/ide/ide-disk.c2005-02-19 17:22:44 +01:00 +++

[patch ide-dev 3/9] merge LBA28 and LBA48 Host Protected Area support code

2005-02-24 Thread Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
* merge idedisk_read_native_max_address() and idedisk_read_native_max_address_ext() * merge idedisk_set_max_address() and idedisk_set_max_address_ext() diff -Nru a/drivers/ide/ide-disk.c b/drivers/ide/ide-disk.c --- a/drivers/ide/ide-disk.c2005-02-19 17:22:44 +01:00 +++

Re: [patch ide-dev 3/9] merge LBA28 and LBA48 Host Protected Area support code

2005-02-24 Thread Greg Freemyer
I have generic question about HPA, not the patch. I have noticed with a SUSE 2.6.8 vendor kernel, the HPA behavior is not consistent. ie. With exactly the same computer/controller, but with different disk drives (models/manufacturers) the HPA behavior varies. In all my testing the HPA was

Re: [patch ide-dev 3/9] merge LBA28 and LBA48 Host Protected Area support code

2005-02-24 Thread Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
On Thursday 24 February 2005 17:10, Greg Freemyer wrote: I have generic question about HPA, not the patch. I have noticed with a SUSE 2.6.8 vendor kernel, the HPA behavior is not consistent. Please retry with vanilla kernel. ie. With exactly the same computer/controller, but with different

Re: [patch ide-dev 3/9] merge LBA28 and LBA48 Host Protected Area support code

2005-02-24 Thread Greg Freemyer
On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 17:30:55 +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thursday 24 February 2005 17:10, Greg Freemyer wrote: I have generic question about HPA, not the patch. I have noticed with a SUSE 2.6.8 vendor kernel, the HPA behavior is not consistent. Please