On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 4:53 PM, David Rientjes wrote:
> On Sat, 8 Sep 2012, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
>
>> @@ -454,15 +455,35 @@ void *__kmalloc_node(size_t size, gfp_t gfp, int node)
>> gfp |= __GFP_COMP;
>> ret = slob_new_pages(gfp, order, node);
>>
>> -
On Sat, 8 Sep 2012, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
> @@ -454,15 +455,35 @@ void *__kmalloc_node(size_t size, gfp_t gfp, int node)
> gfp |= __GFP_COMP;
> ret = slob_new_pages(gfp, order, node);
>
> - trace_kmalloc_node(_RET_IP_, ret,
> +
On Sat, 8 Sep 2012, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
@@ -454,15 +455,35 @@ void *__kmalloc_node(size_t size, gfp_t gfp, int node)
gfp |= __GFP_COMP;
ret = slob_new_pages(gfp, order, node);
- trace_kmalloc_node(_RET_IP_, ret,
+
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 4:53 PM, David Rientjes rient...@google.com wrote:
On Sat, 8 Sep 2012, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
@@ -454,15 +455,35 @@ void *__kmalloc_node(size_t size, gfp_t gfp, int node)
gfp |= __GFP_COMP;
ret = slob_new_pages(gfp, order, node);
-
4 matches
Mail list logo