Re: [patch slab/next] mm, slob: fix build breakage in __kmalloc_node_track_caller

2012-09-25 Thread Ezequiel Garcia
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 4:53 PM, David Rientjes wrote: > On Sat, 8 Sep 2012, Ezequiel Garcia wrote: > >> @@ -454,15 +455,35 @@ void *__kmalloc_node(size_t size, gfp_t gfp, int node) >> gfp |= __GFP_COMP; >> ret = slob_new_pages(gfp, order, node); >> >> -

[patch slab/next] mm, slob: fix build breakage in __kmalloc_node_track_caller

2012-09-25 Thread David Rientjes
On Sat, 8 Sep 2012, Ezequiel Garcia wrote: > @@ -454,15 +455,35 @@ void *__kmalloc_node(size_t size, gfp_t gfp, int node) > gfp |= __GFP_COMP; > ret = slob_new_pages(gfp, order, node); > > - trace_kmalloc_node(_RET_IP_, ret, > +

[patch slab/next] mm, slob: fix build breakage in __kmalloc_node_track_caller

2012-09-25 Thread David Rientjes
On Sat, 8 Sep 2012, Ezequiel Garcia wrote: @@ -454,15 +455,35 @@ void *__kmalloc_node(size_t size, gfp_t gfp, int node) gfp |= __GFP_COMP; ret = slob_new_pages(gfp, order, node); - trace_kmalloc_node(_RET_IP_, ret, +

Re: [patch slab/next] mm, slob: fix build breakage in __kmalloc_node_track_caller

2012-09-25 Thread Ezequiel Garcia
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 4:53 PM, David Rientjes rient...@google.com wrote: On Sat, 8 Sep 2012, Ezequiel Garcia wrote: @@ -454,15 +455,35 @@ void *__kmalloc_node(size_t size, gfp_t gfp, int node) gfp |= __GFP_COMP; ret = slob_new_pages(gfp, order, node); -