Hi Mike,
On 25 September 2017 at 18:33, Mike Kravetz wrote:
> On 09/20/2017 12:25 AM, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
[...]
>> I've applied this, and added Reviewed-by tags for Florian and Jann.
>> But, I think it's also worth noting the older, now disallowed,
Hi Mike,
On 25 September 2017 at 18:33, Mike Kravetz wrote:
> On 09/20/2017 12:25 AM, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
[...]
>> I've applied this, and added Reviewed-by tags for Florian and Jann.
>> But, I think it's also worth noting the older, now disallowed, behavior,
>> and why the
On 09/20/2017 12:25 AM, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
> Hello Mike,
>
> On 09/19/2017 11:42 PM, Mike Kravetz wrote:
>> v2: Fix incorrect wording noticed by Jann Horn.
>> Remove deprecated and memfd_create discussion as suggested
>> by Florian Weimer.
>>
>> Since at least the 2.6 time
On 09/20/2017 12:25 AM, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
> Hello Mike,
>
> On 09/19/2017 11:42 PM, Mike Kravetz wrote:
>> v2: Fix incorrect wording noticed by Jann Horn.
>> Remove deprecated and memfd_create discussion as suggested
>> by Florian Weimer.
>>
>> Since at least the 2.6 time
On 25 September 2017 at 14:36, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Wed 20-09-17 09:25:42, Michael Kerrisk wrote:
> [...]
>> BUGS
>>Before Linux 4.14, if old_size was zero and the mapping referred
>>to by old_address was a private mapping (mmap(2) MAP_PRIVATE),
>>
On 25 September 2017 at 14:36, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Wed 20-09-17 09:25:42, Michael Kerrisk wrote:
> [...]
>> BUGS
>>Before Linux 4.14, if old_size was zero and the mapping referred
>>to by old_address was a private mapping (mmap(2) MAP_PRIVATE),
>>mremap()
On Wed 20-09-17 09:25:42, Michael Kerrisk wrote:
[...]
> BUGS
>Before Linux 4.14, if old_size was zero and the mapping referred
>to by old_address was a private mapping (mmap(2) MAP_PRIVATE),
>mremap() created a new private mapping unrelated to the original
>
On Wed 20-09-17 09:25:42, Michael Kerrisk wrote:
[...]
> BUGS
>Before Linux 4.14, if old_size was zero and the mapping referred
>to by old_address was a private mapping (mmap(2) MAP_PRIVATE),
>mremap() created a new private mapping unrelated to the original
>
Hello Mike,
On 09/19/2017 11:42 PM, Mike Kravetz wrote:
> v2: Fix incorrect wording noticed by Jann Horn.
> Remove deprecated and memfd_create discussion as suggested
> by Florian Weimer.
>
> Since at least the 2.6 time frame, mremap would create a new mapping
> of the same pages if
Hello Mike,
On 09/19/2017 11:42 PM, Mike Kravetz wrote:
> v2: Fix incorrect wording noticed by Jann Horn.
> Remove deprecated and memfd_create discussion as suggested
> by Florian Weimer.
>
> Since at least the 2.6 time frame, mremap would create a new mapping
> of the same pages if
v2: Fix incorrect wording noticed by Jann Horn.
Remove deprecated and memfd_create discussion as suggested
by Florian Weimer.
Since at least the 2.6 time frame, mremap would create a new mapping
of the same pages if 'old_size == 0'. It would also leave the original
mapping. This was
v2: Fix incorrect wording noticed by Jann Horn.
Remove deprecated and memfd_create discussion as suggested
by Florian Weimer.
Since at least the 2.6 time frame, mremap would create a new mapping
of the same pages if 'old_size == 0'. It would also leave the original
mapping. This was
12 matches
Mail list logo