On Thu, 2 Jul 2015, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Wed 01-07-15 14:37:14, David Rientjes wrote:
> > The force_kill member of struct oom_control isn't needed if an order of
> > -1 is used instead. This is the same as order == -1 in
> > struct compact_control which requires full memory compaction.
> >
>
On Wed 01-07-15 14:37:14, David Rientjes wrote:
> The force_kill member of struct oom_control isn't needed if an order of
> -1 is used instead. This is the same as order == -1 in
> struct compact_control which requires full memory compaction.
>
> This patch introduces no functional change.
But i
The force_kill member of struct oom_control isn't needed if an order of
-1 is used instead. This is the same as order == -1 in
struct compact_control which requires full memory compaction.
This patch introduces no functional change.
Signed-off-by: David Rientjes
---
v2: fix changelog typo per
3 matches
Mail list logo
