On Tue, 21 Nov 2017 12:08:32 PST (-0800), j.neuschae...@gmx.net wrote:
On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 09:37:02AM -0800, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
[...]
This isn't really a big deal to me, as I'm only interested in RISC-V
systems, but there's been some pushback on the concept of an SBI so it
seemed like a
On Tue, 21 Nov 2017 12:08:32 PST (-0800), j.neuschae...@gmx.net wrote:
On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 09:37:02AM -0800, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
[...]
This isn't really a big deal to me, as I'm only interested in RISC-V
systems, but there's been some pushback on the concept of an SBI so it
seemed like a
On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 09:37:02AM -0800, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
[...]
> This isn't really a big deal to me, as I'm only interested in RISC-V
> systems, but there's been some pushback on the concept of an SBI so it
> seemed like a simple way to allow people to build non-SBI (and there for not
>
On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 09:37:02AM -0800, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
[...]
> This isn't really a big deal to me, as I'm only interested in RISC-V
> systems, but there's been some pushback on the concept of an SBI so it
> seemed like a simple way to allow people to build non-SBI (and there for not
>
On Mon, 20 Nov 2017 17:08:44 PST (-0800), j.neuschae...@gmx.net wrote:
On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 01:28:01PM -0800, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> > @@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
> > +RISC-V Supervisor Binary Interface (SBI)
> > +
> > +The RISC-V privileged ISA specification mandates the presence of a
supervisor
> >
On Mon, 20 Nov 2017 17:08:44 PST (-0800), j.neuschae...@gmx.net wrote:
On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 01:28:01PM -0800, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> > @@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
> > +RISC-V Supervisor Binary Interface (SBI)
> > +
> > +The RISC-V privileged ISA specification mandates the presence of a
supervisor
> >
On Mon, 20 Nov 2017 13:45:20 PST (-0800), r...@kernel.org wrote:
On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 11:50:00AM -0800, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
The RISC-V privileged ISA mandates the presence of an SBI, but there's
no reason not to put it in the device tree. This would allow us to
possibly remove the SBI
On Mon, 20 Nov 2017 13:45:20 PST (-0800), r...@kernel.org wrote:
On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 11:50:00AM -0800, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
The RISC-V privileged ISA mandates the presence of an SBI, but there's
no reason not to put it in the device tree. This would allow us to
possibly remove the SBI
Hi Palmer,
On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 01:28:01PM -0800, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Nov 2017 12:28:56 PST (-0800), j.neuschae...@gmx.net wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 11:50:00AM -0800, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> > > +RISC-V Supervisor Binary Interface (SBI)
> > > +
> > > +The RISC-V
Hi Palmer,
On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 01:28:01PM -0800, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Nov 2017 12:28:56 PST (-0800), j.neuschae...@gmx.net wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 11:50:00AM -0800, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> > > +RISC-V Supervisor Binary Interface (SBI)
> > > +
> > > +The RISC-V
On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 01:28:01PM -0800, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
[...]
> > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/firmware/riscv.sbi.txt
> >
> > Nit: Other bindings use either a comma (as in the compatible string,
> > "riscv,sbi.txt") or a dash (vendor-product.txt, "riscv-sbi.txt") in the
> >
On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 01:28:01PM -0800, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
[...]
> > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/firmware/riscv.sbi.txt
> >
> > Nit: Other bindings use either a comma (as in the compatible string,
> > "riscv,sbi.txt") or a dash (vendor-product.txt, "riscv-sbi.txt") in the
> >
On Mon, 20 Nov 2017 12:28:56 PST (-0800), j.neuschae...@gmx.net wrote:
On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 11:50:00AM -0800, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
The RISC-V privileged ISA mandates the presence of an SBI, but there's
no reason not to put it in the device tree. This would allow us to
possibly remove the
On Mon, 20 Nov 2017 12:28:56 PST (-0800), j.neuschae...@gmx.net wrote:
On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 11:50:00AM -0800, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
The RISC-V privileged ISA mandates the presence of an SBI, but there's
no reason not to put it in the device tree. This would allow us to
possibly remove the
14 matches
Mail list logo
