Re: [patchlet] rt,locking: fix __ww_mutex_lock_interruptible() lockdep annotation

2015-02-16 Thread Mike Galbraith
On Mon, 2015-02-16 at 13:16 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Mon, 16 Feb 2015 18:24:32 +0100 > Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > > \ > > >Signed-off-by: Mike Galbraith > > > > umgwanakikbuti? The good ones were taken, right? > > I think Mike threw up on the keyboard while creating his user

Re: [patchlet] rt,locking: fix __ww_mutex_lock_interruptible() lockdep annotation

2015-02-16 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Mon, 16 Feb 2015 18:24:32 +0100 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: \ > >Signed-off-by: Mike Galbraith > > umgwanakikbuti? The good ones were taken, right? I think Mike threw up on the keyboard while creating his user name. -- Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line

Re: [patchlet] rt,locking: fix __ww_mutex_lock_interruptible() lockdep annotation

2015-02-16 Thread Mike Galbraith
On Mon, 2015-02-16 at 18:24 +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > umgwanakikbuti? The good ones were taken, right? Yup, I have a low tolerance for "Taken, try again". My next may well be gimmeafuckingaccountdamnit :) -Mike -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line

Re: [patchlet] rt,locking: fix __ww_mutex_lock_interruptible() lockdep annotation

2015-02-16 Thread Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
* Mike Galbraith | 2014-06-02 15:12:44 [+0200]: >Using mutex_acquire_nest() as used in __ww_mutex_lock() fixes the >splat below. Remove superfluous line break in __ww_mutex_lock() >as well. applied. >Signed-off-by: Mike Galbraith umgwanakikbuti? The good ones were taken, right? Sebastian

Re: [patchlet] rt,locking: fix __ww_mutex_lock_interruptible() lockdep annotation

2015-02-16 Thread Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
* Mike Galbraith | 2014-06-02 15:12:44 [+0200]: Using mutex_acquire_nest() as used in __ww_mutex_lock() fixes the splat below. Remove superfluous line break in __ww_mutex_lock() as well. applied. Signed-off-by: Mike Galbraith umgwanakikb...@gmail.com umgwanakikbuti? The good ones were taken,

Re: [patchlet] rt,locking: fix __ww_mutex_lock_interruptible() lockdep annotation

2015-02-16 Thread Mike Galbraith
On Mon, 2015-02-16 at 18:24 +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: umgwanakikbuti? The good ones were taken, right? Yup, I have a low tolerance for Taken, try again. My next may well be gimmeafuckingaccountdamnit :) -Mike -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe

Re: [patchlet] rt,locking: fix __ww_mutex_lock_interruptible() lockdep annotation

2015-02-16 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Mon, 16 Feb 2015 18:24:32 +0100 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior bige...@linutronix.de wrote: \ Signed-off-by: Mike Galbraith umgwanakikb...@gmail.com umgwanakikbuti? The good ones were taken, right? I think Mike threw up on the keyboard while creating his user name. -- Steve -- To unsubscribe

Re: [patchlet] rt,locking: fix __ww_mutex_lock_interruptible() lockdep annotation

2015-02-16 Thread Mike Galbraith
On Mon, 2015-02-16 at 13:16 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote: On Mon, 16 Feb 2015 18:24:32 +0100 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior bige...@linutronix.de wrote: \ Signed-off-by: Mike Galbraith umgwanakikb...@gmail.com umgwanakikbuti? The good ones were taken, right? I think Mike threw up on the

[patchlet] rt,locking: fix __ww_mutex_lock_interruptible() lockdep annotation

2014-06-02 Thread Mike Galbraith
Using mutex_acquire_nest() as used in __ww_mutex_lock() fixes the splat below. Remove superfluous line break in __ww_mutex_lock() as well. [ 56.999063] = [ 56.999063] [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ] [ 56.999065] 3.14.4-rt5 #26 Not

[patchlet] rt,locking: fix __ww_mutex_lock_interruptible() lockdep annotation

2014-06-02 Thread Mike Galbraith
Using mutex_acquire_nest() as used in __ww_mutex_lock() fixes the splat below. Remove superfluous line break in __ww_mutex_lock() as well. [ 56.999063] = [ 56.999063] [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ] [ 56.999065] 3.14.4-rt5 #26 Not