Will,
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 12:05:31PM -0500, William Cohen wrote:
> >The oprofile patch should be made against the oprofile cvs rather than
> >the 0.9.2 tarball. There are some files that the patch touches that are
> >created by the autogen.sh.
> >
> >The oprofile patch doesn't build if
William Cohen wrote:
Hello Stephane,
The oprofile patch should be made against the oprofile cvs rather than
the 0.9.2 tarball. There are some files that the patch touches that are
created by the autogen.sh.
The oprofile patch doesn't build if things are configured without the
William Cohen wrote:
Hello Stephane,
The oprofile patch should be made against the oprofile cvs rather than
the 0.9.2 tarball. There are some files that the patch touches that are
created by the autogen.sh.
The oprofile patch doesn't build if things are configured without the
Will,
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 12:05:31PM -0500, William Cohen wrote:
The oprofile patch should be made against the oprofile cvs rather than
the 0.9.2 tarball. There are some files that the patch touches that are
created by the autogen.sh.
The oprofile patch doesn't build if things are
Stephane Eranian wrote:
Hello,
I have released another version of the perfmon new code base package.
This version of the kernel patch is relative to 2.6.20.
This new kernel patch includes the following new features and
bug fixes:
- first cut at supporting Oprofile on i386 and x86-64
Stephane Eranian wrote:
Hello,
I have released another version of the perfmon new code base package.
This version of the kernel patch is relative to 2.6.20.
This new kernel patch includes the following new features and
bug fixes:
- first cut at supporting Oprofile on i386 and x86-64
6 matches
Mail list logo
