Re: [preview] VIA IDE 4.0 and AMD IDE 2.0 with automatic PC

2001-02-09 Thread Petr Vandrovec
On 9 Feb 01 at 16:58, Vojtech Pavlik wrote: > Unfortunately the PCI speed measuring code needs help from the chipset > itself, so it isn't possible to implement in generic code. Maybe a > callback could be added to the chipset-specific drivers, though ... > > I do have some plans with ide-pci.c

Re: [preview] VIA IDE 4.0 and AMD IDE 2.0 with automatic PC

2001-02-09 Thread Vojtech Pavlik
On Fri, Feb 09, 2001 at 05:29:52PM +, Petr Vandrovec wrote: > > Unfortunately the PCI speed measuring code needs help from the chipset > > itself, so it isn't possible to implement in generic code. Maybe a > > callback could be added to the chipset-specific drivers, though ... > > > > I do h

Re: [preview] VIA IDE 4.0 and AMD IDE 2.0 with automatic PC

2001-02-09 Thread Andre Hedrick
On Fri, 9 Feb 2001, Petr Vandrovec wrote: > On 9 Feb 01 at 16:58, Vojtech Pavlik wrote: > > > Unfortunately the PCI speed measuring code needs help from the chipset > > itself, so it isn't possible to implement in generic code. Maybe a > > callback could be added to the chipset-specific drivers

Re: [preview] VIA IDE 4.0 and AMD IDE 2.0 with automatic PC

2001-02-10 Thread Vojtech Pavlik
On Fri, Feb 09, 2001 at 10:06:39PM -0800, Andre Hedrick wrote: > > > Unfortunately the PCI speed measuring code needs help from the chipset > > > itself, so it isn't possible to implement in generic code. Maybe a > > > callback could be added to the chipset-specific drivers, though ... > > > > >

Re: [preview] VIA IDE 4.0 and AMD IDE 2.0 with automatic PC

2001-02-10 Thread Martin Mares
Hello! > Not the case, sorry. An IDE drive is needed. However, it still might be > worth to pass the PCI speed to other drivers ... But beware, the timing should be a per-bus value. Have a nice fortnight -- Martin `MJ' Mares <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [preview] VIA IDE 4.0 and AMD IDE 2.0 with automatic PC

2001-02-10 Thread Jonathan Morton
>> Not the case, sorry. An IDE drive is needed. However, it still might be >> worth to pass the PCI speed to other drivers ... > >But beware, the timing should be a per-bus value. Indeed - remember the PowerMac G3 (blue & white) and the "Yikes" G4 have a 66MHz PCI slot in place of the AGP slot us