On 10/14, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> Again, this is fine. But why "else" ? It seems that
>
> if (thread_flags & _TIF_SIGPENDING) {
> do_signal(regs, r0, r19);
> r0 = 0;
> }
>
>
On 10/12, Al Viro wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 06:03:37PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > On 10/06, Thorsten Kranzkowski wrote:
> > >
> > > After upgrading from v3.5-rc7 to current git my system oopses and locks up
> > > early in the boot sequence.
> >
> > OK, I am sending the patch which I a
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 06:03:37PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 10/06, Thorsten Kranzkowski wrote:
> >
> > After upgrading from v3.5-rc7 to current git my system oopses and locks up
> > early in the boot sequence.
>
> OK, I am sending the patch which I already showed.
>
> Perhaps we should on
On 10/06, Thorsten Kranzkowski wrote:
>
> After upgrading from v3.5-rc7 to current git my system oopses and locks up
> early in the boot sequence.
OK, I am sending the patch which I already showed.
Perhaps we should only add the warning and local_irq_enable()
should go into arch/alpha/kernel/sign
On 10/08, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>
> Just wondering. As this is on an SMP system, perhaps the
> read_barrier_depends() vs. smp_read_barrier_depends() matters
> here?
> http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1209.3/00555.html
Yes, thanks, I do remember about this ;)
This will come as 2/
On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 9:16 PM, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 10/07, Thorsten Kranzkowski wrote:
>> On Sun, Oct 07, 2012 at 07:13:00PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>> > On 10/07, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>> > > Hmm. I know nothing about arch/alpha and I can't understand its entry.S.
>> > > But _it seems_ t
On 10/07, Al Viro wrote:
>
> On Sun, Oct 07, 2012 at 07:33:36PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> > > Um... There's a bunch of architectures that are in the same situation.
> > > grep for do_notify_resume() and you'll see...
> >
> > And every do_notify_resume() should be changed anyway, do_signal()
Hello! I'm an Alpha user - I just want to thank you all for working to keep
Linux current on this architecture. I am still using the last working Alpha
Core release ... I hope to keep the old beast running for many more years!
Jon Norstog
www.thursdaybicycles.com
On Sun, 7 Oct 2012 20:39:09 +
Hello! I'm an Alpha user - I just want to thank you ll for working to keep
Linux current on this architecture. I am still using the last working Alpha
Core release ... I hope to keep the old beast running for many more years!
Jon Norstog
www.thursdaybicycles.com
On Sun, 7 Oct 2012 20:39:09 +0
On Sun, Oct 07, 2012 at 09:16:27PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 10/07, Thorsten Kranzkowski wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 07, 2012 at 07:13:00PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > > On 10/07, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hmm. I know nothing about arch/alpha and I can't understand its entry.S.
> >
On Sun, Oct 07, 2012 at 07:33:36PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > Um... There's a bunch of architectures that are in the same situation.
> > grep for do_notify_resume() and you'll see...
>
> And every do_notify_resume() should be changed anyway, do_signal() and
> tracehook_notify_resume() shoul
On 10/07, Thorsten Kranzkowski wrote:
>
> On Sun, Oct 07, 2012 at 07:13:00PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > On 10/07, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > >
> > > Hmm. I know nothing about arch/alpha and I can't understand its entry.S.
> > > But _it seems_ to me that do_notify_resume() is called with irqs dis
On Sun, Oct 07, 2012 at 07:13:00PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 10/07, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> >
> > Hmm. I know nothing about arch/alpha and I can't understand its entry.S.
> > But _it seems_ to me that do_notify_resume() is called with irqs disabled.
> > If this is true, then imho arch/alpha s
On 10/07, Al Viro wrote:
>
> On Sun, Oct 07, 2012 at 06:55:34PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> > Hmm. I know nothing about arch/alpha and I can't understand its entry.S.
> > But _it seems_ to me that do_notify_resume() is called with irqs disabled.
> > If this is true, then imho arch/alpha should
On 10/07, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> Hmm. I know nothing about arch/alpha and I can't understand its entry.S.
> But _it seems_ to me that do_notify_resume() is called with irqs disabled.
> If this is true, then imho arch/alpha should be fixed.
>
> Before this commit task_work_run() enabled irqs, but
On Sun, Oct 07, 2012 at 06:55:34PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> Hmm. I know nothing about arch/alpha and I can't understand its entry.S.
> But _it seems_ to me that do_notify_resume() is called with irqs disabled.
> If this is true, then imho arch/alpha should be fixed.
>
> Before this commit ta
16 matches
Mail list logo
