Re: [reiserfs-dev] Re: reiserfs, xfs, ext2, ext3

2001-05-13 Thread Hans Reiser
"Albert D. Cahalan" wrote: > Hans Reiser writes: > > > Tell us what to code for, and so long as it doesn't involve looking > > up files by their 32 bit inode numbers we'll probably be happy to > > code to it. The Neil Brown stuff is already coded for though. > > Next time around, when you

Re: [reiserfs-dev] Re: reiserfs, xfs, ext2, ext3

2001-05-13 Thread Chris Mason
On Friday, May 11, 2001 04:00:20 AM -0700 Hans Reiser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Alan Cox wrote: > >> > Are you referring to Neil Brown's nfs operations patch as being as >> > ugly as hell, or something else? Just want to understand what you are >> > saying before arguing. >> >> Andi

Re: [reiserfs-dev] Re: reiserfs, xfs, ext2, ext3

2001-05-13 Thread Chris Mason
On Friday, May 11, 2001 04:00:20 AM -0700 Hans Reiser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Alan Cox wrote: Are you referring to Neil Brown's nfs operations patch as being as ugly as hell, or something else? Just want to understand what you are saying before arguing. Andi has sent me some

Re: [reiserfs-dev] Re: reiserfs, xfs, ext2, ext3

2001-05-13 Thread Hans Reiser
Albert D. Cahalan wrote: Hans Reiser writes: Tell us what to code for, and so long as it doesn't involve looking up files by their 32 bit inode numbers we'll probably be happy to code to it. The Neil Brown stuff is already coded for though. Next time around, when you update the

Re: [reiserfs-dev] Re: reiserfs, xfs, ext2, ext3

2001-05-11 Thread Chris Mason
On Friday, May 11, 2001 12:07:08 PM -0700 Hans Reiser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "Albert D. Cahalan" wrote: > >> Hans Reiser writes: >> >> > Tell us what to code for, and so long as it doesn't involve looking >> > up files by their 32 bit inode numbers we'll probably be happy to >> > code

Re: [reiserfs-dev] Re: reiserfs, xfs, ext2, ext3

2001-05-11 Thread Albert D. Cahalan
Hans Reiser writes: > Tell us what to code for, and so long as it doesn't involve looking > up files by their 32 bit inode numbers we'll probably be happy to > code to it. The Neil Brown stuff is already coded for though. Next time around, when you update the on-disk format, how about allowing

Re: [reiserfs-dev] Re: reiserfs, xfs, ext2, ext3

2001-05-11 Thread Hans Reiser
Alan Cox wrote: > > Are you referring to Neil Brown's nfs operations patch as being as ugly as > > hell, or something else? Just want to understand what you are saying before > > arguing. > > Andi has sent me some stuff to look at. He listed four implementations and I've > only seen two of

Re: [reiserfs-dev] Re: reiserfs, xfs, ext2, ext3

2001-05-11 Thread Hans Reiser
Alan Cox wrote: Are you referring to Neil Brown's nfs operations patch as being as ugly as hell, or something else? Just want to understand what you are saying before arguing. Andi has sent me some stuff to look at. He listed four implementations and I've only seen two of them did

Re: [reiserfs-dev] Re: reiserfs, xfs, ext2, ext3

2001-05-11 Thread Albert D. Cahalan
Hans Reiser writes: Tell us what to code for, and so long as it doesn't involve looking up files by their 32 bit inode numbers we'll probably be happy to code to it. The Neil Brown stuff is already coded for though. Next time around, when you update the on-disk format, how about allowing

Re: [reiserfs-dev] Re: reiserfs, xfs, ext2, ext3

2001-05-11 Thread Chris Mason
On Friday, May 11, 2001 12:07:08 PM -0700 Hans Reiser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Albert D. Cahalan wrote: Hans Reiser writes: Tell us what to code for, and so long as it doesn't involve looking up files by their 32 bit inode numbers we'll probably be happy to code to it. The Neil