On Mon, 2019-09-16 at 12:45 -0700, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 4:50 PM Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Thu, 2019-09-12 at 15:45 -0700, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> > > If you want to email me just the patch file (so I don't have to
> > > copy+pasta from an email),
> >
> > Lazy... ;)
On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 4:50 PM Joe Perches wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2019-09-12 at 15:45 -0700, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> > If you want to email me just the patch file (so I don't have to
> > copy+pasta from an email),
>
> Lazy... ;)
Says the Perl programmer...http://threevirtues.com/ ;)
>
> > I'd be
On Thu, 2019-09-12 at 15:45 -0700, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> If you want to email me just the patch file (so I don't have to
> copy+pasta from an email),
Lazy... ;)
> I'd be happy to apply it and compile+boot test a few more arch's
> than x86.
Thanks. attached.
section.pl
Description: Perl p
On Sun, Sep 8, 2019 at 9:21 PM Joe Perches wrote:
> So running the script:
>
> $ perl section.pl
>
> produces a commit
> ---
> From 04e52f34fd4ee7008ea5bf0d8896bf8d1fdf9f3f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> Message-Id:
> <04e52f34fd4ee7008ea5bf0d8896bf8d1fdf9f3f.1568001863.git@perches.com>
> From:
This is an example script that could be applied to
-next to get compiler coverage testing for a treewide
conversion of __section(foo) to __section("foo")
I compiled an x86 defconfig but the coverage for this
script output, but it's possible an arch or two may have
asm compilation without including
5 matches
Mail list logo