On 28/10/2015 at 22:31:48 +0900, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote :
> > So you don't care about DT backward compatibility because when a
> > workaround will be needed for one of the IPs, then you will have to
> > update the old dtb to use it.
>
> Nope, DTB does not contain the name for RTC driver (s2mps1
W dniu 28.10.2015 o 19:30, Alim Akhtar pisze:
> Hi Alexandre,
>
> On 10/28/2015 03:18 PM, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
>> On 28/10/2015 at 12:31:43 +0900, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote :
>>> The s2mps13 clock driver added new name and compatible... which was
>>> probably totally unneeded (I missed that du
W dniu 28.10.2015 o 18:48, Alexandre Belloni pisze:
> On 28/10/2015 at 12:31:43 +0900, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote :
>> The s2mps13 clock driver added new name and compatible... which was
>> probably totally unneeded (I missed that during review). We don't have
>> to make this as a rule...
>>
>> Sinc
Hi Alexandre,
On 10/28/2015 03:18 PM, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
On 28/10/2015 at 12:31:43 +0900, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote :
The s2mps13 clock driver added new name and compatible... which was
probably totally unneeded (I missed that during review). We don't have
to make this as a rule...
Since
On 28/10/2015 at 12:31:43 +0900, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote :
> The s2mps13 clock driver added new name and compatible... which was
> probably totally unneeded (I missed that during review). We don't have
> to make this as a rule...
>
> Since we do not have any data about future workarounds and the
5 matches
Mail list logo
