10.08.2014, 19:31, "Oleg Nesterov" :
> On 08/09, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>> That would suggest we're failing to do the TASK_DEAD thing properly, and
>> ARGH! bloody obvious why, see the this_rq() comment right before the
>> finish_task_switch() call in context_switch().
>
> Off-topic, but perhap
On 08/09, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> That would suggest we're failing to do the TASK_DEAD thing properly, and
> ARGH! bloody obvious why, see the this_rq() comment right before the
> finish_task_switch() call in context_switch().
Off-topic, but perhaps we can make this a bit more clear?
Hmm. But a
On 08/09, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> That would suggest we're failing to do the TASK_DEAD thing properly, and
> ARGH! bloody obvious why, see the this_rq() comment right before the
> finish_task_switch() call in context_switch().
Heh ;) and a similar comment in __schedule() after context_switch().
On Sat, Aug 09, 2014 at 10:30:34PM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> We noticed the below changes on
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/peterz/queue.git sched/wait
> commit d58d631b474c552dce72da2dce9dd276d731b79a ("sched: Fix
> finish_task_switch vs prev_state")
>
> tes
Hi Peter,
We noticed the below changes on
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/peterz/queue.git sched/wait
commit d58d631b474c552dce72da2dce9dd276d731b79a ("sched: Fix finish_task_switch
vs prev_state")
test case: vm-vp-quantal-x86_64/boot/1
9e6e6179961e8dd d58d631b474c552dce72da2dc
5 matches
Mail list logo