Re: [sched] c3a340f7e7: invalid_opcode:#[##]

2020-10-20 Thread Florian Fainelli
On 6/30/20 7:49 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 02:46:28PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: >> On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 08:31:27AM +0800, kernel test robot wrote: >>> Greeting, >>> >>> FYI, we noticed the following commit (built with gcc-4.9): >>> >>> commit:

Re: [sched] c3a340f7e7: invalid_opcode:#[##]

2020-06-30 Thread Peter Zijlstra
On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 02:46:28PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 08:31:27AM +0800, kernel test robot wrote: > > Greeting, > > > > FYI, we noticed the following commit (built with gcc-4.9): > > > > commit: c3a340f7e7eadac7662ab104ceb16432e5a4c6b2 ("sched: Have > >

Re: [sched] c3a340f7e7: invalid_opcode:#[##]

2020-06-30 Thread Peter Zijlstra
On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 04:02:31PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 03:55:05PM +0200, Rasmus Villemoes wrote: > > > > Consistently so with GCC-4.9. Any other GCC I tried does the sane thing. > > > > Does that include gcc 4.8, or is it only "anything newer than 4.9"? > > It

Re: [sched] c3a340f7e7: invalid_opcode:#[##]

2020-06-30 Thread Peter Zijlstra
On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 04:02:31PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 03:55:05PM +0200, Rasmus Villemoes wrote: > > > > Consistently so with GCC-4.9. Any other GCC I tried does the sane thing. > > > > Does that include gcc 4.8, or is it only "anything newer than 4.9"? > > It

Re: [sched] c3a340f7e7: invalid_opcode:#[##]

2020-06-30 Thread Peter Zijlstra
On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 03:55:05PM +0200, Rasmus Villemoes wrote: > > Consistently so with GCC-4.9. Any other GCC I tried does the sane thing. > > Does that include gcc 4.8, or is it only "anything newer than 4.9"? It includes 4.8 :-) > so the section it was put in has an alignment of 64. The

Re: [sched] c3a340f7e7: invalid_opcode:#[##]

2020-06-30 Thread Rasmus Villemoes
On 30/06/2020 14.46, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 08:31:27AM +0800, kernel test robot wrote: >> Greeting, >> >> FYI, we noticed the following commit (built with gcc-4.9): >> >> commit: c3a340f7e7eadac7662ab104ceb16432e5a4c6b2 ("sched: Have >> sched_class_highest define by

Re: [sched] c3a340f7e7: invalid_opcode:#[##]

2020-06-30 Thread Peter Zijlstra
On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 08:31:27AM +0800, kernel test robot wrote: > Greeting, > > FYI, we noticed the following commit (built with gcc-4.9): > > commit: c3a340f7e7eadac7662ab104ceb16432e5a4c6b2 ("sched: Have > sched_class_highest define by vmlinux.lds.h") > [1.840970] kernel BUG at