On Monday 11 June 2007 20:27, Chris Wright wrote:
> * Thomas Gleixner ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > The PC-speaker code has a quite creative method to serialize access to
> > the PIT: It uses a local lock.
> >
> > On i386 and x86_64 the access to the PIT is serialized by a lock in the
> >
* Thomas Gleixner ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> The PC-speaker code has a quite creative method to serialize access to
> the PIT: It uses a local lock.
>
> On i386 and x86_64 the access to the PIT is serialized by a lock in the
> architecture code. The separate locking in the PC-speaker code
* Thomas Gleixner ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
The PC-speaker code has a quite creative method to serialize access to
the PIT: It uses a local lock.
On i386 and x86_64 the access to the PIT is serialized by a lock in the
architecture code. The separate locking in the PC-speaker code ignores
On Monday 11 June 2007 20:27, Chris Wright wrote:
* Thomas Gleixner ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
The PC-speaker code has a quite creative method to serialize access to
the PIT: It uses a local lock.
On i386 and x86_64 the access to the PIT is serialized by a lock in the
architecture
4 matches
Mail list logo