>>> dean gaudet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 14.12.06 09:40 >>>
>On Thu, 14 Dec 2006, Jan Beulich wrote:
>
>> >with the patch it boots perfectly without any command-line args.
>>
>> Are you getting the 'Firmware space is locked read-only' message then?
>
>yep...
>
>so let me ask a naive question... don't
On Thu, 14 Dec 2006, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >with the patch it boots perfectly without any command-line args.
>
> Are you getting the 'Firmware space is locked read-only' message then?
yep...
so let me ask a naive question... don't we want the firmware locked
read-only because that protects the
>with the patch it boots perfectly without any command-line args.
Are you getting the 'Firmware space is locked read-only' message then?
Thanks, Jan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at
with the patch it boots perfectly without any command-line args.
Are you getting the 'Firmware space is locked read-only' message then?
Thanks, Jan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at
On Thu, 14 Dec 2006, Jan Beulich wrote:
with the patch it boots perfectly without any command-line args.
Are you getting the 'Firmware space is locked read-only' message then?
yep...
so let me ask a naive question... don't we want the firmware locked
read-only because that protects the
dean gaudet [EMAIL PROTECTED] 14.12.06 09:40
On Thu, 14 Dec 2006, Jan Beulich wrote:
with the patch it boots perfectly without any command-line args.
Are you getting the 'Firmware space is locked read-only' message then?
yep...
so let me ask a naive question... don't we want the firmware
On Wed, 13 Dec 2006, Chris Wright wrote:
> * dean gaudet ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > just for the public record (i already communicated with Jan in private
> > mail on this one)... i have a box which hangs hard starting at 2.6.18.2
> > and 2.6.19 -- hangs hard during the intel hw rng tests
* dean gaudet ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> just for the public record (i already communicated with Jan in private
> mail on this one)... i have a box which hangs hard starting at 2.6.18.2
> and 2.6.19 -- hangs hard during the intel hw rng tests (no sysrq
> response). and the hang occurs prior
On Wed, 29 Nov 2006, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> Dave Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 24.11.06 21:27 >>>
> >On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 08:53:08AM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > > >It does appear to work w/out the patch. I've asked for a small bit
> > > >of diagnostics (below), perhaps you've got something
On Wed, 29 Nov 2006, Jan Beulich wrote:
Dave Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] 24.11.06 21:27
On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 08:53:08AM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
It does appear to work w/out the patch. I've asked for a small bit
of diagnostics (below), perhaps you've got something you'd rather see?
* dean gaudet ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
just for the public record (i already communicated with Jan in private
mail on this one)... i have a box which hangs hard starting at 2.6.18.2
and 2.6.19 -- hangs hard during the intel hw rng tests (no sysrq
response). and the hang occurs prior to
On Wed, 13 Dec 2006, Chris Wright wrote:
* dean gaudet ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
just for the public record (i already communicated with Jan in private
mail on this one)... i have a box which hangs hard starting at 2.6.18.2
and 2.6.19 -- hangs hard during the intel hw rng tests (no
>>> Dave Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 24.11.06 21:27 >>>
>On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 08:53:08AM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > >It does appear to work w/out the patch. I've asked for a small bit
> > >of diagnostics (below), perhaps you've got something you'd rather see?
> > >I expect this to be a 24C0
Dave Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] 24.11.06 21:27
On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 08:53:08AM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
It does appear to work w/out the patch. I've asked for a small bit
of diagnostics (below), perhaps you've got something you'd rather see?
I expect this to be a 24C0 LPC Bridge.
>>> Dave Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 24.11.06 21:27 >>>
>On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 08:53:08AM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > >It does appear to work w/out the patch. I've asked for a small bit
> > >of diagnostics (below), perhaps you've got something you'd rather see?
> > >I expect this to be a 24C0
Dave Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] 24.11.06 21:27
On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 08:53:08AM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
It does appear to work w/out the patch. I've asked for a small bit
of diagnostics (below), perhaps you've got something you'd rather see?
I expect this to be a 24C0 LPC Bridge.
16 matches
Mail list logo