Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, Feb 28, 2007 at 05:28:27AM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>>
>> What are the rules that are supposed to govern backports to stable
>> trees these days anyway?
>
> Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt
Ok if that is really what we are going with,
On Wed, Feb 28, 2007 at 05:28:27AM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>
> What are the rules that are supposed to govern backports to stable
> trees these days anyway?
Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt
thanks,
greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel"
On Wed, Feb 28, 2007 at 05:28:27AM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
What are the rules that are supposed to govern backports to stable
trees these days anyway?
Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt
thanks,
greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
Greg KH [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, Feb 28, 2007 at 05:28:27AM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
What are the rules that are supposed to govern backports to stable
trees these days anyway?
Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt
Ok if that is really what we are going with, the this
4 matches
Mail list logo