Re: [stable] [patch 00/45] 2.6.24-stable review

2008-02-08 Thread Greg KH
On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 01:58:34PM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 11:41:42PM +0200, S.??a??lar Onur wrote: > > Hi; > > > > 07 ??ub 2008 Per tarihinde, Greg KH ??unlar?? yazmt??: > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 2.6.24.1 release. > > > There are 45

Re: [stable] [patch 00/45] 2.6.24-stable review

2008-02-08 Thread Greg KH
On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 01:58:34PM -0800, Greg KH wrote: On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 11:41:42PM +0200, S.??a??lar Onur wrote: Hi; 07 ??ub 2008 Per tarihinde, Greg KH ??unlar?? yazmt??: This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 2.6.24.1 release. There are 45 patches in

Re: [stable] [patch 00/45] 2.6.24-stable review

2008-02-07 Thread Greg KH
On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 12:45:49PM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 2.6.24.1 release. > There are 45 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to > this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let > us know. If

Re: [stable] [patch 00/45] 2.6.24-stable review

2008-02-07 Thread Greg KH
On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 12:24:57PM +1100, David Chinner wrote: > On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 05:12:30PM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 11:44:30AM +1100, David Chinner wrote: > > > Greg, > > > > > > Is there any reason why the XFS patch I sent to the stable list a > > > couple of

Re: [stable] [patch 00/45] 2.6.24-stable review

2008-02-07 Thread Greg KH
On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 06:50:34PM -0500, Chuck Ebbert wrote: > On 02/07/2008 03:45 PM, Greg KH wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 2.6.24.1 release. > > There are 45 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to > > this one. If anyone has any issues

Re: [stable] [patch 00/45] 2.6.24-stable review

2008-02-07 Thread David Chinner
On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 05:12:30PM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 11:44:30AM +1100, David Chinner wrote: > > Greg, > > > > Is there any reason why the XFS patch I sent to the stable list a > > couple of days ago is not included in this series? > > > >

Re: [stable] [patch 00/45] 2.6.24-stable review

2008-02-07 Thread Greg KH
On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 11:44:30AM +1100, David Chinner wrote: > Greg, > > Is there any reason why the XFS patch I sent to the stable list a > couple of days ago is not included in this series? > > http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2008-02/msg00027.html > > We've had multiple reports of it, and

Re: [stable] [patch 00/45] 2.6.24-stable review

2008-02-07 Thread Greg KH
On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 11:44:30AM +1100, David Chinner wrote: Greg, Is there any reason why the XFS patch I sent to the stable list a couple of days ago is not included in this series? http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2008-02/msg00027.html We've had multiple reports of it, and multiple

Re: [stable] [patch 00/45] 2.6.24-stable review

2008-02-07 Thread David Chinner
On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 05:12:30PM -0800, Greg KH wrote: On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 11:44:30AM +1100, David Chinner wrote: Greg, Is there any reason why the XFS patch I sent to the stable list a couple of days ago is not included in this series?

Re: [stable] [patch 00/45] 2.6.24-stable review

2008-02-07 Thread Greg KH
On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 06:50:34PM -0500, Chuck Ebbert wrote: On 02/07/2008 03:45 PM, Greg KH wrote: This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 2.6.24.1 release. There are 45 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these

Re: [stable] [patch 00/45] 2.6.24-stable review

2008-02-07 Thread Greg KH
On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 12:24:57PM +1100, David Chinner wrote: On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 05:12:30PM -0800, Greg KH wrote: On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 11:44:30AM +1100, David Chinner wrote: Greg, Is there any reason why the XFS patch I sent to the stable list a couple of days ago is not

Re: [stable] [patch 00/45] 2.6.24-stable review

2008-02-07 Thread Greg KH
On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 12:45:49PM -0800, Greg KH wrote: This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 2.6.24.1 release. There are 45 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let us know. If anyone