Re: [stable] libata spindown patches for 2.6.21-stable

2007-06-14 Thread Greg KH
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 01:48:46PM -0400, Daniel Drake wrote: > Greg KH wrote: > > I think it looks way too big. > > Agreed (otherwise I would have submitted the patches already). > > > If there are smaller patches, it might be a bit more reasonable. > > It may be possible to get rid of the

Re: [stable] libata spindown patches for 2.6.21-stable

2007-06-14 Thread Daniel Drake
Greg KH wrote: I think it looks way too big. Agreed (otherwise I would have submitted the patches already). If there are smaller patches, it might be a bit more reasonable. It may be possible to get rid of the couple of unrelated ones (sd printing, SCSI constants). These were required for

Re: [stable] libata spindown patches for 2.6.21-stable

2007-06-14 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Thu, 14 Jun 2007, Greg KH wrote: > Are there reported bugs that this patchset fixes? Yes, at least one I opened and which got a CODE_FIX when Tejun prepared the first version of the patch. http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7838 -- "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find

Re: [stable] libata spindown patches for 2.6.21-stable

2007-06-14 Thread Greg KH
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 12:01:14PM -0400, Chuck Ebbert wrote: > Should we put these patches in 2.6.21-stable? > > Gentoo developers did a full backport: > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-ide=118047865916766=2 I think it looks way too big. If there are smaller patches, it might be a bit more

[stable] libata spindown patches for 2.6.21-stable

2007-06-14 Thread Chuck Ebbert
Should we put these patches in 2.6.21-stable? Gentoo developers did a full backport: http://marc.info/?l=linux-ide=118047865916766=2 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at

[stable] libata spindown patches for 2.6.21-stable

2007-06-14 Thread Chuck Ebbert
Should we put these patches in 2.6.21-stable? Gentoo developers did a full backport: http://marc.info/?l=linux-idem=118047865916766w=2 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at

Re: [stable] libata spindown patches for 2.6.21-stable

2007-06-14 Thread Greg KH
added Daniel to CC: On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 12:01:14PM -0400, Chuck Ebbert wrote: Should we put these patches in 2.6.21-stable? Gentoo developers did a full backport: http://marc.info/?l=linux-idem=118047865916766w=2 I think it looks way too big. If there are smaller patches, it might be

Re: [stable] libata spindown patches for 2.6.21-stable

2007-06-14 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Thu, 14 Jun 2007, Greg KH wrote: Are there reported bugs that this patchset fixes? Yes, at least one I opened and which got a CODE_FIX when Tejun prepared the first version of the patch. http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7838 -- One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them.

Re: [stable] libata spindown patches for 2.6.21-stable

2007-06-14 Thread Daniel Drake
Greg KH wrote: I think it looks way too big. Agreed (otherwise I would have submitted the patches already). If there are smaller patches, it might be a bit more reasonable. It may be possible to get rid of the couple of unrelated ones (sd printing, SCSI constants). These were required for

Re: [stable] libata spindown patches for 2.6.21-stable

2007-06-14 Thread Greg KH
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 01:48:46PM -0400, Daniel Drake wrote: Greg KH wrote: I think it looks way too big. Agreed (otherwise I would have submitted the patches already). If there are smaller patches, it might be a bit more reasonable. It may be possible to get rid of the couple of