On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 01:48:46PM -0400, Daniel Drake wrote:
> Greg KH wrote:
> > I think it looks way too big.
>
> Agreed (otherwise I would have submitted the patches already).
>
> > If there are smaller patches, it might be a bit more reasonable.
>
> It may be possible to get rid of the
Greg KH wrote:
I think it looks way too big.
Agreed (otherwise I would have submitted the patches already).
If there are smaller patches, it might be a bit more reasonable.
It may be possible to get rid of the couple of unrelated ones (sd
printing, SCSI constants). These were required for
On Thu, 14 Jun 2007, Greg KH wrote:
> Are there reported bugs that this patchset fixes?
Yes, at least one I opened and which got a CODE_FIX when Tejun prepared the
first version of the patch.
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7838
--
"One disk to rule them all, One disk to find
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 12:01:14PM -0400, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
> Should we put these patches in 2.6.21-stable?
>
> Gentoo developers did a full backport:
>
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-ide=118047865916766=2
I think it looks way too big.
If there are smaller patches, it might be a bit more
Should we put these patches in 2.6.21-stable?
Gentoo developers did a full backport:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-ide=118047865916766=2
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at
Should we put these patches in 2.6.21-stable?
Gentoo developers did a full backport:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-idem=118047865916766w=2
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at
added Daniel to CC:
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 12:01:14PM -0400, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
Should we put these patches in 2.6.21-stable?
Gentoo developers did a full backport:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-idem=118047865916766w=2
I think it looks way too big.
If there are smaller patches, it might be
On Thu, 14 Jun 2007, Greg KH wrote:
Are there reported bugs that this patchset fixes?
Yes, at least one I opened and which got a CODE_FIX when Tejun prepared the
first version of the patch.
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7838
--
One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them.
Greg KH wrote:
I think it looks way too big.
Agreed (otherwise I would have submitted the patches already).
If there are smaller patches, it might be a bit more reasonable.
It may be possible to get rid of the couple of unrelated ones (sd
printing, SCSI constants). These were required for
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 01:48:46PM -0400, Daniel Drake wrote:
Greg KH wrote:
I think it looks way too big.
Agreed (otherwise I would have submitted the patches already).
If there are smaller patches, it might be a bit more reasonable.
It may be possible to get rid of the couple of
10 matches
Mail list logo