On 07/12/2007 08:52 PM, Chris Wright wrote:
Nish, I think you might be the only user ;-) I never figured out a nice
way to do this w/out having a coherency issue (well, triggers aside).
Ideally git would allow for something more transparent than alternatives,
actual moving view to another tre
On Thu, Jul 12, 2007 at 11:52:19AM -0700, Chris Wright wrote:
> * Nish Aravamudan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > On 7/12/07, Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > That is a tree that Chris did, and I didn't realize we were maintaining
> > > it as the "official" stable tree, that is why it is not
On 7/12/07, Chris Wright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
* Nish Aravamudan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On 7/12/07, Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > That is a tree that Chris did, and I didn't realize we were maintaining
> > it as the "official" stable tree, that is why it is not mentioned in th
* Nish Aravamudan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On 7/12/07, Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > That is a tree that Chris did, and I didn't realize we were maintaining
> > it as the "official" stable tree, that is why it is not mentioned in the
> > release notes :)
>
> Fair enough -- it's just a
On 7/12/07, Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, Jul 12, 2007 at 11:35:41AM -0700, Nish Aravamudan wrote:
> On 7/10/07, Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > We (the -stable team) are announcing the release of the 2.6.22.1 kernel.
> > It contains a security fix for SCTP that somehow forgot
On Thu, Jul 12, 2007 at 11:35:41AM -0700, Nish Aravamudan wrote:
> On 7/10/07, Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > We (the -stable team) are announcing the release of the 2.6.22.1 kernel.
> > It contains a security fix for SCTP that somehow forgot to be added to
> > the 2.6.22 kernel (was alread
6 matches
Mail list logo
