On Tue, 13 Apr 2021 09:56:40 +0200
Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> Thanks for looking into this.
> If this is not a kernel bug, then it must not use WARN_ON[_ONCE]. It
> makes the kernel untestable for both automated systems and humans:
>
> https://lwn.net/Articles/769365/
>
>
> Greg Kroah-Hartman rais
On Fri, Apr 2, 2021 at 2:41 AM 'Yonghong Song' via syzkaller-bugs
wrote:
> > On 4/1/21 4:29 AM, syzbot wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> syzbot found the following issue on:
> >>
> >> HEAD commit:36e79851 libbpf: Preserve empty DATASEC BTFs during
> >> static..
> >> git tree: bpf-next
> >> co
On 4/1/21 3:05 PM, Yonghong Song wrote:
On 4/1/21 4:29 AM, syzbot wrote:
Hello,
syzbot found the following issue on:
HEAD commit: 36e79851 libbpf: Preserve empty DATASEC BTFs during
static..
git tree: bpf-next
console output:
https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=1569bb06d
On 4/1/21 4:29 AM, syzbot wrote:
Hello,
syzbot found the following issue on:
HEAD commit:36e79851 libbpf: Preserve empty DATASEC BTFs during static..
git tree: bpf-next
console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=1569bb06d0
kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspo
Hello,
syzbot found the following issue on:
HEAD commit:36e79851 libbpf: Preserve empty DATASEC BTFs during static..
git tree: bpf-next
console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=1569bb06d0
kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=7eff0f22b8563a5f
das
5 matches
Mail list logo