On Wed, 2014-01-22 at 18:06 +, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 09:30:23AM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> > Perhaps the biggest benefit of cc'ing lkml is
> > a centralized repository of proposed patches in
> > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/LKML/list/
>
> Which isn't triumphantly
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 09:30:23AM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-01-22 at 16:09 +, Mark Brown wrote:
> > and in practice doing so would make it even harder to work with
> > than it is at the minute.
> How? What is "it" here?
linux-kernel, it's rather hig volume.
> > In practice
On Wed, 2014-01-22 at 18:36 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Joe Perches wrote:
>
> > Your main argument is that some people don't cc lkml
> > because section entries don't specify it explicitly.
>
> No, my main argument continues to be that having a 'at a glance'
> contact summary _in a single pl
* Joe Perches wrote:
> Your main argument is that some people don't cc lkml
> because section entries don't specify it explicitly.
No, my main argument continues to be that having a 'at a glance'
contact summary _in a single place_ is eminently useful to humans,
because it's so simple:
>>
On Wed, 2014-01-22 at 16:09 +, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 05:02:24AM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> > So I think the rule should be either every section has
> > an lkml entry or no section does.
[]
> The other option is that we just don't worry if people CC lkml or not -
> for thi
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 05:02:24AM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-01-22 at 13:27 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > * Joe Perches wrote:
> > You have cut out my main argument from you reply and have ignored it:
> Not ignored. Threaded email works fine.
> Your main argument is that some pe
On Wed, 2014-01-22 at 13:27 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Joe Perches wrote:
[]
> You have cut out my main argument from you reply and have ignored it:
Not ignored. Threaded email works fine.
Your main argument is that some people don't cc lkml
because section entries don't specify it explicit
Commit-ID: 981c3a4ff8596a9dcd2b058ee12d6749639c32a5
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/981c3a4ff8596a9dcd2b058ee12d6749639c32a5
Author: Ingo Molnar
AuthorDate: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 10:59:20 +0100
Committer: Ingo Molnar
CommitDate: Wed, 22 Jan 2014 13:25:55 +0100
MAINTAINERS: Restore "L: lin
* Joe Perches wrote:
> Also, SubmittingPatches had and still has:
>
> 6) Select your CC (e-mail carbon copy) list.
>
> Unless you have a reason NOT to do so, CC linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org.
>
> Arguably, that same info should be added to the
> MAINTAINERS header instead of each s
On Tue, 2014-01-21 at 07:49 -0800, tip-bot for Ingo Molnar wrote:
> MAINTAINERS: Restore "L: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" entries
>
> A couple of years ago all the "L: lkml" email list entries in
> MAINTAINERS were removed and replaced with a 'the rest' entry
> at the end of the file - under the
Commit-ID: 62f45f9a202c318fd5fb43cd40ef687b7dd2825f
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/62f45f9a202c318fd5fb43cd40ef687b7dd2825f
Author: Ingo Molnar
AuthorDate: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 10:59:20 +0100
Committer: Ingo Molnar
CommitDate: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 11:24:40 +0100
MAINTAINERS: Restore "L: lin
11 matches
Mail list logo
