On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 8:27 AM, Linus Torvalds
wrote:
>
> Hmm. Did you guys miss the patch I sent for this yesterday? It avoided
> the header file dependency, and imho also generated better code by
> uninlining the slow path.
Ahh, I see I have another thread that
On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 8:27 AM, Linus Torvalds
wrote:
>
> Hmm. Did you guys miss the patch I sent for this yesterday? It avoided
> the header file dependency, and imho also generated better code by
> uninlining the slow path.
Ahh, I see I have another thread that has reactions to it. Will go
On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 2:18 AM, tip-bot for Ingo Molnar
wrote:
> Author: Ingo Molnar
>
> sched/wait: Add dependency for now
>
> The wait_event_interruptible*() APIs are using signal_pending(), so
> include its header to not build-break users of those
On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 2:18 AM, tip-bot for Ingo Molnar
wrote:
> Author: Ingo Molnar
>
> sched/wait: Add dependency for now
>
> The wait_event_interruptible*() APIs are using signal_pending(), so
> include its header to not build-break users of those APIs.
Hmm. Did you guys miss the patch
4 matches
Mail list logo