On Mon, 02 May, at 09:56:09AM, Jeremy Compostella wrote:
>
> Please find the updated patch in attachment.
Thanks Jeremy. Applied.
Matt Fleming writes:
> On Fri, 29 Apr, at 03:53:39PM, Jeremy Compostella wrote:
>> From ef3a2941769e59b11d1ec36117209dc4c90c7cf9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Jeremy Compostella
>> Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2016 15:29:59 +0200
>> Subject: [PATCH] efibc: fix excessive stack footprint warning
>>
>> U
On Sun, 01 May, at 10:03:55AM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>
> Apologies for only mentioning this now, but I wonder why we need this
> in the kernel in the first place? The UEFI spec defines 'BootNext' as
> the way to set the boot entry for the next boot only, and this could
> also be set from userland.
On 29 April 2016 at 11:53, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * tip-bot for Compostella, Jeremy wrote:
>
>> Commit-ID: 06f7d4a1618dbb086e738c93cd1ef416ab01027d
>> Gitweb:
>> http://git.kernel.org/tip/06f7d4a1618dbb086e738c93cd1ef416ab01027d
>> Author: Compostella, Jeremy
>> AuthorDate: Mon, 25 Apr
On Fri, 29 Apr, at 03:53:39PM, Jeremy Compostella wrote:
> From ef3a2941769e59b11d1ec36117209dc4c90c7cf9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Jeremy Compostella
> Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2016 15:29:59 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] efibc: fix excessive stack footprint warning
>
> Use dynamic memory allocation in
On Sat, 30 Apr, at 10:33:32AM, Jeremy Compostella wrote:
> Ingo Molnar writes:
> >
> > Hm, can reboot notifiers do non-atomic allocations?
> The reboot notifier chain is a blocking notifier chain. AFAIK, it
> allows non-atomic allocation, right ?
I would assume so, yes.
> > Why is efivar_entry
Ingo Molnar writes:
> * Compostella, Jeremy wrote:
>
>> -static void efibc_set_variable(const char *name, const char *value)
>> +static int efibc_set_variable(const char *name, const char *value)
>> {
>> int ret;
>> efi_guid_t guid = LINUX_EFI_LOADER_ENTRY_GUID;
>> -struct efivar_
* Compostella, Jeremy wrote:
> -static void efibc_set_variable(const char *name, const char *value)
> +static int efibc_set_variable(const char *name, const char *value)
> {
> int ret;
> efi_guid_t guid = LINUX_EFI_LOADER_ENTRY_GUID;
> - struct efivar_entry entry;
> + struct
Matt Fleming writes:
> On Fri, 29 Apr, at 01:36:01PM, Jeremy Compostella wrote:
>> I would go for this last proposal because it fixes the issue, it works
>> with the potential race condition you mentioned and it is a simple
>> solution. Yet, it means that if we really run into a race condition,
On Fri, 29 Apr, at 01:36:01PM, Jeremy Compostella wrote:
> I would go for this last proposal because it fixes the issue, it works
> with the potential race condition you mentioned and it is a simple
> solution. Yet, it means that if we really run into a race condition,
> the LoaderEntryOneShot val
Matt Fleming writes:
> On Fri, 29 Apr, at 11:53:56AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>>
>> * tip-bot for Compostella, Jeremy wrote:
>>
>> > Commit-ID: 06f7d4a1618dbb086e738c93cd1ef416ab01027d
>> > Gitweb:
>> > http://git.kernel.org/tip/06f7d4a1618dbb086e738c93cd1ef416ab01027d
>> > Author: Compos
On Fri, 29 Apr, at 11:53:56AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * tip-bot for Compostella, Jeremy wrote:
>
> > Commit-ID: 06f7d4a1618dbb086e738c93cd1ef416ab01027d
> > Gitweb:
> > http://git.kernel.org/tip/06f7d4a1618dbb086e738c93cd1ef416ab01027d
> > Author: Compostella, Jeremy
> > AuthorDate: M
* tip-bot for Compostella, Jeremy wrote:
> Commit-ID: 06f7d4a1618dbb086e738c93cd1ef416ab01027d
> Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/06f7d4a1618dbb086e738c93cd1ef416ab01027d
> Author: Compostella, Jeremy
> AuthorDate: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 21:06:57 +0100
> Committer: Ingo Molnar
> CommitDat
Commit-ID: 06f7d4a1618dbb086e738c93cd1ef416ab01027d
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/06f7d4a1618dbb086e738c93cd1ef416ab01027d
Author: Compostella, Jeremy
AuthorDate: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 21:06:57 +0100
Committer: Ingo Molnar
CommitDate: Thu, 28 Apr 2016 11:34:02 +0200
efibc: Add EFI Bootl
14 matches
Mail list logo