On Thu, Jul 06, 2017 at 09:28:58AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> It's more straightforward to just do the canonical sem->count >= 0 test that
> we do
> elsewhere in the rwsem-spinlock code.
>
> PeterZ, what's your preference?
Leave it as is.. it doesn't matter (the 0 case shouldn't happen) and as
* Niklas Cassel wrote:
> On 07/05/2017 04:27 PM, tip-bot for Kirill Tkhai wrote:
> > Commit-ID: a0c4acd2c220376b4e9690e75782d0c0afdaab9f
> > Gitweb:
> > http://git.kernel.org/tip/a0c4acd2c220376b4e9690e75782d0c0afdaab9f
> > Author: Kirill Tkhai
> > AuthorDate: Fri, 16 Jun 2017 16:44:34
On 07/05/2017 04:27 PM, tip-bot for Kirill Tkhai wrote:
> Commit-ID: a0c4acd2c220376b4e9690e75782d0c0afdaab9f
> Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/a0c4acd2c220376b4e9690e75782d0c0afdaab9f
> Author: Kirill Tkhai
> AuthorDate: Fri, 16 Jun 2017 16:44:34 +0300
> Committer: Ingo Molnar
> Comm
Commit-ID: a0c4acd2c220376b4e9690e75782d0c0afdaab9f
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/a0c4acd2c220376b4e9690e75782d0c0afdaab9f
Author: Kirill Tkhai
AuthorDate: Fri, 16 Jun 2017 16:44:34 +0300
Committer: Ingo Molnar
CommitDate: Wed, 5 Jul 2017 12:26:29 +0200
locking/rwsem-spinlock: Fix
4 matches
Mail list logo