Commit-ID: 1b02cd6a2d7f3e2a6a5262887d2cb2912083e42f Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/1b02cd6a2d7f3e2a6a5262887d2cb2912083e42f Author: luca abeni <luca.ab...@santannapisa.it> AuthorDate: Mon, 25 Mar 2019 14:15:30 +0100 Committer: Ingo Molnar <mi...@kernel.org> CommitDate: Tue, 16 Apr 2019 16:54:58 +0200
sched/deadline: Correctly handle active 0-lag timers syzbot reported the following warning: [ ] WARNING: CPU: 4 PID: 17089 at kernel/sched/deadline.c:255 task_non_contending+0xae0/0x1950 line 255 of deadline.c is: WARN_ON(hrtimer_active(&dl_se->inactive_timer)); in task_non_contending(). Unfortunately, in some cases (for example, a deadline task continuosly blocking and waking immediately) it can happen that a task blocks (and task_non_contending() is called) while the 0-lag timer is still active. In this case, the safest thing to do is to immediately decrease the running bandwidth of the task, without trying to re-arm the 0-lag timer. Signed-off-by: luca abeni <luca.ab...@santannapisa.it> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <pet...@infradead.org> Acked-by: Juri Lelli <juri.le...@redhat.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torva...@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <pet...@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de> Cc: chengjian (D) <cj.chengj...@huawei.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190325131530.34706-1-luca.ab...@santannapisa.it Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mi...@kernel.org> --- kernel/sched/deadline.c | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadline.c index 6a73e41a2016..43901fa3f269 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c +++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c @@ -252,7 +252,6 @@ static void task_non_contending(struct task_struct *p) if (dl_entity_is_special(dl_se)) return; - WARN_ON(hrtimer_active(&dl_se->inactive_timer)); WARN_ON(dl_se->dl_non_contending); zerolag_time = dl_se->deadline - @@ -269,7 +268,7 @@ static void task_non_contending(struct task_struct *p) * If the "0-lag time" already passed, decrease the active * utilization now, instead of starting a timer */ - if (zerolag_time < 0) { + if ((zerolag_time < 0) || hrtimer_active(&dl_se->inactive_timer)) { if (dl_task(p)) sub_running_bw(dl_se, dl_rq); if (!dl_task(p) || p->state == TASK_DEAD) {