On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 12:34:15PM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 09, 2016 at 05:30:30AM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > If the initialization fails before tpm_chip_register(), put_device()
> > will be not called, which causes release callback not to be called.
> > This patch fixes
On Tue, Feb 09, 2016 at 05:30:30AM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> If the initialization fails before tpm_chip_register(), put_device()
> will be not called, which causes release callback not to be called.
> This patch fixes the issue by adding put_device() to devres list of
> the parent device.
>
On Tue, Feb 09, 2016 at 05:30:30AM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> If the initialization fails before tpm_chip_register(), put_device()
> will be not called, which causes release callback not to be called.
> This patch fixes the issue by adding put_device() to devres list of
> the parent device.
>
On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 12:34:15PM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 09, 2016 at 05:30:30AM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > If the initialization fails before tpm_chip_register(), put_device()
> > will be not called, which causes release callback not to be called.
> > This patch fixes
On Tue, Feb 09, 2016 at 08:27:35AM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 09, 2016 at 08:19:51AM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 10:26:55PM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > > On Tue, Feb 09, 2016 at 05:30:30AM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > > > If the
On Tue, Feb 09, 2016 at 08:27:35AM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 09, 2016 at 08:19:51AM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 10:26:55PM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > > On Tue, Feb 09, 2016 at 05:30:30AM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > > > If the
On Tue, Feb 09, 2016 at 08:19:51AM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 10:26:55PM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 09, 2016 at 05:30:30AM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > > If the initialization fails before tpm_chip_register(), put_device()
> > > will be not
On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 10:26:55PM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 09, 2016 at 05:30:30AM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > If the initialization fails before tpm_chip_register(), put_device()
> > will be not called, which causes release callback not to be called.
> > This patch fixes
On Tue, Feb 09, 2016 at 05:30:30AM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> If the initialization fails before tpm_chip_register(), put_device()
> will be not called, which causes release callback not to be called.
> This patch fixes the issue by adding put_device() to devres list of
> the parent device.
On Tue, Feb 09, 2016 at 05:30:30AM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> If the initialization fails before tpm_chip_register(), put_device()
> will be not called, which causes release callback not to be called.
> This patch fixes the issue by adding put_device() to devres list of
> the parent device.
On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 10:26:55PM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 09, 2016 at 05:30:30AM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > If the initialization fails before tpm_chip_register(), put_device()
> > will be not called, which causes release callback not to be called.
> > This patch fixes
On Tue, Feb 09, 2016 at 08:19:51AM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 10:26:55PM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 09, 2016 at 05:30:30AM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > > If the initialization fails before tpm_chip_register(), put_device()
> > > will be not
12 matches
Mail list logo