>> Yes, no problem.
>> I'll create a patch without it -
>> I'll make it this way that you can apply the conversion patch first
>> and then the change.
>Thanks!
>Kent
The new version of my patch was just sent - please apply this one first.
Thanks,
Peter
-
> > I'd suggest not to. Mixing actual changes with cleanups is generally
> > discouraged.
>
> Yes, please don't do this. Also because it makes it really
> confusing for me to figure out whether something has been applied or
> not and if I have the right people on the sign off.
>
> Peter, can
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 4:32 PM, Jean Delvare wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Feb 2013 23:12:51 +0100, Peter Hüwe wrote:
>> thanks for resending.
>
> You're welcome.
>
>> Am Donnerstag, 28. Februar 2013, 11:06:11 schrieb Jean Delvare:
>> > From: Shubhrajyoti Datta
>> >
>> > Convert the struct i2c_msg initial
On Thu, 28 Feb 2013 23:12:51 +0100, Peter Hüwe wrote:
> thanks for resending.
You're welcome.
> Am Donnerstag, 28. Februar 2013, 11:06:11 schrieb Jean Delvare:
> > From: Shubhrajyoti Datta
> >
> > Convert the struct i2c_msg initialization to C99 format. This makes
> > maintaining and editing th
Hi,
thanks for resending.
Am Donnerstag, 28. Februar 2013, 11:06:11 schrieb Jean Delvare:
> From: Shubhrajyoti Datta
>
> Convert the struct i2c_msg initialization to C99 format. This makes
> maintaining and editing the code simpler. Also helps once other fields
> like transferred are added in
5 matches
Mail list logo
