On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 07:12:57PM +0530, Nayna wrote:
>
>
> On 11/15/2016 05:18 AM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 04:02:43PM -0800, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > > On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 09:51:45AM +0530, Nayna wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 10/09/2016 03:44 PM, Jarkko Sa
On 11/15/2016 05:18 AM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 04:02:43PM -0800, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 09:51:45AM +0530, Nayna wrote:
On 10/09/2016 03:44 PM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
Refactored tpm2_get_tpm_pt to tpm2_getcap_cmd, which means that it also
take
On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 02:38:21PM +0530, Nayna wrote:
>
>
> On 11/18/2016 09:43 PM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 05:42:01PM +0530, Nayna wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On 11/17/2016 11:12 PM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 05:20:36PM +0530, Nayna wrote:
On 11/18/2016 09:43 PM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 05:42:01PM +0530, Nayna wrote:
On 11/17/2016 11:12 PM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 05:20:36PM +0530, Nayna wrote:
I tested this for capability TPM2_CAP_PCRS. It seems TPM2_CAP_PCRS
capability always
On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 05:42:01PM +0530, Nayna wrote:
>
>
> On 11/17/2016 11:12 PM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 05:20:36PM +0530, Nayna wrote:
> >
> > > I tested this for capability TPM2_CAP_PCRS. It seems TPM2_CAP_PCRS
> > > capability always returns full PCR allocation,
On 11/17/2016 11:12 PM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 05:20:36PM +0530, Nayna wrote:
I tested this for capability TPM2_CAP_PCRS. It seems TPM2_CAP_PCRS
capability always returns full PCR allocation, and more_data as 0, So, I
think the idea of looping over based on more_data m
On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 05:20:36PM +0530, Nayna wrote:
> I tested this for capability TPM2_CAP_PCRS. It seems TPM2_CAP_PCRS
> capability always returns full PCR allocation, and more_data as 0, So, I
> think the idea of looping over based on more_data may not work for this
> capability.
You can a
On 11/12/2016 05:32 AM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 09:51:45AM +0530, Nayna wrote:
On 10/09/2016 03:44 PM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
Refactored tpm2_get_tpm_pt to tpm2_getcap_cmd, which means that it also
takes capability ID as input. This is required to access
TPM_CAP_HANDL
On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 04:02:43PM -0800, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 09:51:45AM +0530, Nayna wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 10/09/2016 03:44 PM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > > Refactored tpm2_get_tpm_pt to tpm2_getcap_cmd, which means that it also
> > > takes capability ID as input. Th
On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 09:51:45AM +0530, Nayna wrote:
>
>
> On 10/09/2016 03:44 PM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > Refactored tpm2_get_tpm_pt to tpm2_getcap_cmd, which means that it also
> > takes capability ID as input. This is required to access
> > TPM_CAP_HANDLES, which contains metadata needed
On 10/09/2016 03:44 PM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
Refactored tpm2_get_tpm_pt to tpm2_getcap_cmd, which means that it also
takes capability ID as input. This is required to access
TPM_CAP_HANDLES, which contains metadata needed for swapping transient
data.
Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen
---
dri
11 matches
Mail list logo