[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> I've the doubt that the addition would better go under sys-i386 or
> some other subarch-dependent directories (in a file compiled against
> kernelspace headers, i.e. not listed in USER_OBJS in the directory
> it's contained inside), and it'd be nice to add also the x86_
On Friday 04 February 2005 20:38, Frank Sorenson wrote:
> The stack randomization patches that went into 2.6.11-rc3-mm1 broke
> compilation of ARCH=um. This patch fixes compiling by adding
> arch_align_stack back in.
>
> Signed-off-by: Frank Sorenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Acked-By: Jeff Dike <[EMA
2 matches
Mail list logo