On Sunday 14 August 2005 03:38, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Blaisorblade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Ok, I've been working for the past two weeks learning well the Linux
> > VM, understanding the Ingo's remap_file_pages protection support and
> > its various weakness (due to lack of time on his part
* David S. Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Blaisorblade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2005 20:56:11 +0200
>
> > However, I sent the initial tarball containing all them, so I hope
> > that will be useful.
>
> So not only did you spam the list with 40 patch postings, you sent
From: Blaisorblade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2005 20:56:11 +0200
> However, I sent the initial tarball containing all them, so I hope
> that will be useful.
So not only did you spam the list with 40 patch postings,
you sent a second copy of everything as a tarball attachment
as well.
On Friday 12 August 2005 20:29, David S. Miller wrote:
> Please do not BOMB linux-kernel with 39 patches in one
> go, that will kill the list server.
> Try to consolidate your patch groups into smaller pieces,
> like so about 10 or 15 at a time. And send any that remain
> on some later date.
Whoo
4 matches
Mail list logo