Re: [uml-devel] Re: [RFC] [patch 0/39] remap_file_pages protection support, try 2

2005-08-22 Thread Blaisorblade
On Sunday 14 August 2005 03:38, Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Blaisorblade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Ok, I've been working for the past two weeks learning well the Linux > > VM, understanding the Ingo's remap_file_pages protection support and > > its various weakness (due to lack of time on his part

Re: [uml-devel] Re: [RFC] [patch 0/39] remap_file_pages protection support, try 2

2005-08-13 Thread Ingo Molnar
* David S. Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: Blaisorblade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2005 20:56:11 +0200 > > > However, I sent the initial tarball containing all them, so I hope > > that will be useful. > > So not only did you spam the list with 40 patch postings, you sent

Re: [uml-devel] Re: [RFC] [patch 0/39] remap_file_pages protection support, try 2

2005-08-12 Thread David S. Miller
From: Blaisorblade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2005 20:56:11 +0200 > However, I sent the initial tarball containing all them, so I hope > that will be useful. So not only did you spam the list with 40 patch postings, you sent a second copy of everything as a tarball attachment as well.

Re: [uml-devel] Re: [RFC] [patch 0/39] remap_file_pages protection support, try 2

2005-08-12 Thread Blaisorblade
On Friday 12 August 2005 20:29, David S. Miller wrote: > Please do not BOMB linux-kernel with 39 patches in one > go, that will kill the list server. > Try to consolidate your patch groups into smaller pieces, > like so about 10 or 15 at a time. And send any that remain > on some later date. Whoo