On 2006-12-29, Tim Schmielau wrote:
[]
> OK, building 2.6.20-rc2-mm1 with all 59 configs from arch/arm/configs
> with and w/o the patch indeed found one mysterious #include that may not
> be removed. Thanks, Russell!
>
> Andrew, please use the attached patch instead of the previous one, it also
On 2006-12-29, Tim Schmielau wrote:
[]
OK, building 2.6.20-rc2-mm1 with all 59 configs from arch/arm/configs
with and w/o the patch indeed found one mysterious #include that may not
be removed. Thanks, Russell!
Andrew, please use the attached patch instead of the previous one, it also
has
On Fri, Dec 29, 2006 at 11:23:58AM +0100, Tim Schmielau wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Dec 2006, Tim Schmielau wrote:
> > On Thu, 28 Dec 2006, Russell King wrote:
> >
> > > To cover these, you need to build at least rpc_defconfig,
> > > lubbock_defconfig,
> > > netwinder_defconfig, badge4_defconfig,
On Fri, Dec 29, 2006 at 11:23:58AM +0100, Tim Schmielau wrote:
On Thu, 28 Dec 2006, Tim Schmielau wrote:
On Thu, 28 Dec 2006, Russell King wrote:
To cover these, you need to build at least rpc_defconfig,
lubbock_defconfig,
netwinder_defconfig, badge4_defconfig, cerf_defconfig,
On Fri, 29 Dec 2006, Tim Schmielau wrote:
> Andrew, please use the attached patch instead of the previous one, it also
> has a slightly better patch description.
This time I actually attached something. Sorry.
(In case anybody wonders: yes, I did get some sleep while the builds were
running)
On Thu, 28 Dec 2006, Tim Schmielau wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Dec 2006, Russell King wrote:
>
> > To cover these, you need to build at least rpc_defconfig, lubbock_defconfig,
> > netwinder_defconfig, badge4_defconfig, cerf_defconfig, ...etc...
>
> OK, I'll try to do that.
> Do I need to build all the
On Thu, 28 Dec 2006, Tim Schmielau wrote:
On Thu, 28 Dec 2006, Russell King wrote:
To cover these, you need to build at least rpc_defconfig, lubbock_defconfig,
netwinder_defconfig, badge4_defconfig, cerf_defconfig, ...etc...
OK, I'll try to do that.
Do I need to build all the configs in
On Fri, 29 Dec 2006, Tim Schmielau wrote:
Andrew, please use the attached patch instead of the previous one, it also
has a slightly better patch description.
This time I actually attached something. Sorry.
(In case anybody wonders: yes, I did get some sleep while the builds were
running)
8 matches
Mail list logo