On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 11:01:52AM +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> I just wonder are you doing this because there is some worthwhile
> performance gain? Or to enable more testing and development of LTO?
> Any clues for why a user would want to enable it.
I'm primarily interested in CFI, which
On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 11:01:52AM +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> I just wonder are you doing this because there is some worthwhile
> performance gain? Or to enable more testing and development of LTO?
> Any clues for why a user would want to enable it.
I'm primarily interested in CFI, which
On Mon, 20 Nov 2017 12:21:52 -0800
Sami Tolvanen wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 18, 2017 at 01:21:39PM +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> > Do you have any kind of numbers for this, out of curiosity? Binary
> > size, performance, build time?
>
> I don't have performance numbers to
On Mon, 20 Nov 2017 12:21:52 -0800
Sami Tolvanen wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 18, 2017 at 01:21:39PM +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> > Do you have any kind of numbers for this, out of curiosity? Binary
> > size, performance, build time?
>
> I don't have performance numbers to share. Are there any
On Sat, Nov 18, 2017 at 01:21:39PM +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> Do you have any kind of numbers for this, out of curiosity? Binary
> size, performance, build time?
I don't have performance numbers to share. Are there any specific
benchmarks you'd be interested in seeing? Build time typically
On Sat, Nov 18, 2017 at 01:21:39PM +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> Do you have any kind of numbers for this, out of curiosity? Binary
> size, performance, build time?
I don't have performance numbers to share. Are there any specific
benchmarks you'd be interested in seeing? Build time typically
On Wed, 15 Nov 2017 13:34:22 -0800
Sami Tolvanen wrote:
> This change adds the configuration option CONFIG_LTO_CLANG, and
> build system support for clang's Link Time Optimization (LTO). In
> preparation for LTO support for other compilers, potentially common
> parts of
On Wed, 15 Nov 2017 13:34:22 -0800
Sami Tolvanen wrote:
> This change adds the configuration option CONFIG_LTO_CLANG, and
> build system support for clang's Link Time Optimization (LTO). In
> preparation for LTO support for other compilers, potentially common
> parts of the changes are gated
8 matches
Mail list logo