Re: [v2 4/4] clk: x86: Support RV architecture

2020-07-27 Thread Agrawal, Akshu
On 7/21/2020 1:35 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote: Quoting Akshu Agrawal (2020-07-19 22:04:59) diff --git a/drivers/clk/x86/clk-fch.c b/drivers/clk/x86/clk-fch.c index b252f0cf0628..d68bca7b213f 100644 --- a/drivers/clk/x86/clk-fch.c +++ b/drivers/clk/x86/clk-fch.c [...] static int fch_clk_remove

Re: [v2 4/4] clk: x86: Support RV architecture

2020-07-21 Thread Stephen Boyd
Quoting Akshu Agrawal (2020-07-19 22:04:59) > diff --git a/drivers/clk/x86/clk-fch.c b/drivers/clk/x86/clk-fch.c > index b252f0cf0628..d68bca7b213f 100644 > --- a/drivers/clk/x86/clk-fch.c > +++ b/drivers/clk/x86/clk-fch.c [...] > > static int fch_clk_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) > { >

[v2 4/4] clk: x86: Support RV architecture

2020-07-19 Thread Akshu Agrawal
There is minor difference between previous family of SoC and the current one. Which is the there is only 48Mh fixed clk. There is no mux and no option to select another freq as there in previous. Signed-off-by: Akshu Agrawal --- v2: Consolidated the loops in remove. drivers/clk/x86/clk-fch.c |