Re: [v3 PATCH 2/3] powernv-cpufreq: Fix pstate_to_idx() to handle non-continguous pstates

On Wednesday, January 10, 2018 9:55:45 AM CET Gautham R Shenoy wrote: > Hi Rafael, > > On Wed, Jan 03, 2018 at 11:47:58PM +1100, Balbir Singh wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 11:07 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki > > wrote: > > > On Monday, December 18, 2017 9:38:20 AM CET Gautham R

Re: [v3 PATCH 2/3] powernv-cpufreq: Fix pstate_to_idx() to handle non-continguous pstates

On Wednesday, January 10, 2018 9:55:45 AM CET Gautham R Shenoy wrote: > Hi Rafael, > > On Wed, Jan 03, 2018 at 11:47:58PM +1100, Balbir Singh wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 11:07 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki > > wrote: > > > On Monday, December 18, 2017 9:38:20 AM CET Gautham R Shenoy wrote: > > >>

Re: [v3 PATCH 2/3] powernv-cpufreq: Fix pstate_to_idx() to handle non-continguous pstates

Hi Rafael, On Wed, Jan 03, 2018 at 11:47:58PM +1100, Balbir Singh wrote: > On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 11:07 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Monday, December 18, 2017 9:38:20 AM CET Gautham R Shenoy wrote: > >> Hi Balbir, > >> > >> On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 02:15:25PM +1100,

Re: [v3 PATCH 2/3] powernv-cpufreq: Fix pstate_to_idx() to handle non-continguous pstates

Hi Rafael, On Wed, Jan 03, 2018 at 11:47:58PM +1100, Balbir Singh wrote: > On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 11:07 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Monday, December 18, 2017 9:38:20 AM CET Gautham R Shenoy wrote: > >> Hi Balbir, > >> > >> On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 02:15:25PM +1100, Balbir Singh wrote: >

Re: [v3 PATCH 2/3] powernv-cpufreq: Fix pstate_to_idx() to handle non-continguous pstates

On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 11:07 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Monday, December 18, 2017 9:38:20 AM CET Gautham R Shenoy wrote: >> Hi Balbir, >> >> On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 02:15:25PM +1100, Balbir Singh wrote: >> > On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 5:57 PM, Gautham R. Shenoy >> >

Re: [v3 PATCH 2/3] powernv-cpufreq: Fix pstate_to_idx() to handle non-continguous pstates

On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 11:07 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Monday, December 18, 2017 9:38:20 AM CET Gautham R Shenoy wrote: >> Hi Balbir, >> >> On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 02:15:25PM +1100, Balbir Singh wrote: >> > On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 5:57 PM, Gautham R. Shenoy >> > wrote: >> > > From:

Re: [v3 PATCH 2/3] powernv-cpufreq: Fix pstate_to_idx() to handle non-continguous pstates

On Monday, December 18, 2017 9:38:20 AM CET Gautham R Shenoy wrote: > Hi Balbir, > > On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 02:15:25PM +1100, Balbir Singh wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 5:57 PM, Gautham R. Shenoy > > wrote: > > > From: "Gautham R. Shenoy"

Re: [v3 PATCH 2/3] powernv-cpufreq: Fix pstate_to_idx() to handle non-continguous pstates

On Monday, December 18, 2017 9:38:20 AM CET Gautham R Shenoy wrote: > Hi Balbir, > > On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 02:15:25PM +1100, Balbir Singh wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 5:57 PM, Gautham R. Shenoy > > wrote: > > > From: "Gautham R. Shenoy" > > > > > > The code in powernv-cpufreq, makes the

Re: [v3 PATCH 2/3] powernv-cpufreq: Fix pstate_to_idx() to handle non-continguous pstates

Hi Balbir, On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 02:15:25PM +1100, Balbir Singh wrote: > On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 5:57 PM, Gautham R. Shenoy > wrote: > > From: "Gautham R. Shenoy" > > > > The code in powernv-cpufreq, makes the following two assumptions which >

Re: [v3 PATCH 2/3] powernv-cpufreq: Fix pstate_to_idx() to handle non-continguous pstates

Hi Balbir, On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 02:15:25PM +1100, Balbir Singh wrote: > On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 5:57 PM, Gautham R. Shenoy > wrote: > > From: "Gautham R. Shenoy" > > > > The code in powernv-cpufreq, makes the following two assumptions which > > are not guaranteed by the device-tree bindings:

Re: [v3 PATCH 2/3] powernv-cpufreq: Fix pstate_to_idx() to handle non-continguous pstates

On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 5:57 PM, Gautham R. Shenoy wrote: > From: "Gautham R. Shenoy" > > The code in powernv-cpufreq, makes the following two assumptions which > are not guaranteed by the device-tree bindings: > > 1) Pstate ids are

Re: [v3 PATCH 2/3] powernv-cpufreq: Fix pstate_to_idx() to handle non-continguous pstates

On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 5:57 PM, Gautham R. Shenoy wrote: > From: "Gautham R. Shenoy" > > The code in powernv-cpufreq, makes the following two assumptions which > are not guaranteed by the device-tree bindings: > > 1) Pstate ids are continguous: This is used in pstate_to_idx() to >

[v3 PATCH 2/3] powernv-cpufreq: Fix pstate_to_idx() to handle non-continguous pstates

From: "Gautham R. Shenoy" The code in powernv-cpufreq, makes the following two assumptions which are not guaranteed by the device-tree bindings: 1) Pstate ids are continguous: This is used in pstate_to_idx() to obtain the reverse map from a pstate to it's

[v3 PATCH 2/3] powernv-cpufreq: Fix pstate_to_idx() to handle non-continguous pstates

From: "Gautham R. Shenoy" The code in powernv-cpufreq, makes the following two assumptions which are not guaranteed by the device-tree bindings: 1) Pstate ids are continguous: This is used in pstate_to_idx() to obtain the reverse map from a pstate to it's corresponding entry