On 06/02/2013 11:13 PM, Minchan Kim wrote:
> I lost from this description.
>
> Old behavior
>
> delete_from_swap_cache
> swap_address_space
> __delete_from_swap_cache
> swap_address_space
>
>
> New behavior
>
> delete_from_swap_cache
>
Hello Dave,
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 11:38:58AM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
>
> From: Dave Hansen
>
> swapcache_free() takes two arguments:
>
> void swapcache_free(swp_entry_t entry, struct page *page)
>
> Most of its callers (5/7) are from error handling paths haven't even
> instantiated
Hello Dave,
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 11:38:58AM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
From: Dave Hansen dave.han...@linux.intel.com
swapcache_free() takes two arguments:
void swapcache_free(swp_entry_t entry, struct page *page)
Most of its callers (5/7) are from error handling paths haven't
On 06/02/2013 11:13 PM, Minchan Kim wrote:
I lost from this description.
Old behavior
delete_from_swap_cache
swap_address_space
__delete_from_swap_cache
swap_address_space
New behavior
delete_from_swap_cache
__delete_from_swap_cache
From: Dave Hansen
swapcache_free() takes two arguments:
void swapcache_free(swp_entry_t entry, struct page *page)
Most of its callers (5/7) are from error handling paths haven't even
instantiated a page, so they pass page=NULL. Both of the callers
that call in with a 'struct page'
From: Dave Hansen dave.han...@linux.intel.com
swapcache_free() takes two arguments:
void swapcache_free(swp_entry_t entry, struct page *page)
Most of its callers (5/7) are from error handling paths haven't even
instantiated a page, so they pass page=NULL. Both of the callers
that call
6 matches
Mail list logo