On 04.02.2021 20:17, Yang Shi wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 12:31 AM Kirill Tkhai wrote:
>>
>> On 03.02.2021 20:20, Yang Shi wrote:
>>> Currently the number of deferred objects are per shrinker, but some slabs,
>>> for example,
>>> vfs inode/dentry cache are per memcg, this would result in poor
On Fri, Feb 5, 2021 at 6:38 AM Kirill Tkhai wrote:
>
> On 04.02.2021 20:17, Yang Shi wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 12:31 AM Kirill Tkhai wrote:
> >>
> >> On 03.02.2021 20:20, Yang Shi wrote:
> >>> Currently the number of deferred objects are per shrinker, but some
> >>> slabs, for example,
>
On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 12:31 AM Kirill Tkhai wrote:
>
> On 03.02.2021 20:20, Yang Shi wrote:
> > Currently the number of deferred objects are per shrinker, but some slabs,
> > for example,
> > vfs inode/dentry cache are per memcg, this would result in poor isolation
> > among memcgs.
> >
> > The
On 03.02.2021 20:20, Yang Shi wrote:
> Currently the number of deferred objects are per shrinker, but some slabs,
> for example,
> vfs inode/dentry cache are per memcg, this would result in poor isolation
> among memcgs.
>
> The deferred objects typically are generated by __GFP_NOFS allocations,
Currently the number of deferred objects are per shrinker, but some slabs, for
example,
vfs inode/dentry cache are per memcg, this would result in poor isolation among
memcgs.
The deferred objects typically are generated by __GFP_NOFS allocations, one
memcg with
excessive __GFP_NOFS allocations
5 matches
Mail list logo