On 2/9/21 9:43 PM, Roman Gushchin wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 09, 2021 at 09:46:38AM -0800, Yang Shi wrote:
>> Both memcg_shrinker_map_size and shrinker_nr_max is maintained, but actually
>> the
>> map size can be calculated via shrinker_nr_max, so it seems unnecessary to
>> keep both.
>> Remove
On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 12:43 PM Roman Gushchin wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 09, 2021 at 09:46:38AM -0800, Yang Shi wrote:
> > Both memcg_shrinker_map_size and shrinker_nr_max is maintained, but
> > actually the
> > map size can be calculated via shrinker_nr_max, so it seems unnecessary to
> > keep
On Tue, Feb 09, 2021 at 09:46:38AM -0800, Yang Shi wrote:
> Both memcg_shrinker_map_size and shrinker_nr_max is maintained, but actually
> the
> map size can be calculated via shrinker_nr_max, so it seems unnecessary to
> keep both.
> Remove memcg_shrinker_map_size since shrinker_nr_max is also
Both memcg_shrinker_map_size and shrinker_nr_max is maintained, but actually the
map size can be calculated via shrinker_nr_max, so it seems unnecessary to keep
both.
Remove memcg_shrinker_map_size since shrinker_nr_max is also used by iterating
the
bit map.
Acked-by: Kirill Tkhai
4 matches
Mail list logo