On Mon, Mar 8, 2021 at 12:30 PM Yang Shi wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 8, 2021 at 11:12 AM Shakeel Butt wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 4:13 PM Yang Shi wrote:
> > >
> > > Currently the number of deferred objects are per shrinker, but some
> > > slabs, for example,
> > > vfs inode/dentry cache
On Mon, Mar 8, 2021 at 11:12 AM Shakeel Butt wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 4:13 PM Yang Shi wrote:
> >
> > Currently the number of deferred objects are per shrinker, but some slabs,
> > for example,
> > vfs inode/dentry cache are per memcg, this would result in poor isolation
> > among mem
On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 4:13 PM Yang Shi wrote:
>
> Currently the number of deferred objects are per shrinker, but some slabs,
> for example,
> vfs inode/dentry cache are per memcg, this would result in poor isolation
> among memcgs.
>
> The deferred objects typically are generated by __GFP_NOFS
On 17.02.2021 03:13, Yang Shi wrote:
> Currently the number of deferred objects are per shrinker, but some slabs,
> for example,
> vfs inode/dentry cache are per memcg, this would result in poor isolation
> among memcgs.
>
> The deferred objects typically are generated by __GFP_NOFS allocations,
On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 04:13:18PM -0800, Yang Shi wrote:
> Currently the number of deferred objects are per shrinker, but some slabs,
> for example,
> vfs inode/dentry cache are per memcg, this would result in poor isolation
> among memcgs.
>
> The deferred objects typically are generated by __
Currently the number of deferred objects are per shrinker, but some slabs, for
example,
vfs inode/dentry cache are per memcg, this would result in poor isolation among
memcgs.
The deferred objects typically are generated by __GFP_NOFS allocations, one
memcg with
excessive __GFP_NOFS allocations
6 matches
Mail list logo