On 09/08, Jens Axboe wrote:
>On 09/07/2016 08:04 PM, Ye Xiaolong wrote:
>>On 09/08, Fengguang Wu wrote:
>>>Hi Jens and Tejun,
>>>
The command line was in the original email:
$ qemu-system-x86_64 -enable-kvm -cpu Westmere -m 512M
And agree, in general it'd be nice if there was
On 09/08, Jens Axboe wrote:
>On 09/07/2016 08:04 PM, Ye Xiaolong wrote:
>>On 09/08, Fengguang Wu wrote:
>>>Hi Jens and Tejun,
>>>
The command line was in the original email:
$ qemu-system-x86_64 -enable-kvm -cpu Westmere -m 512M
And agree, in general it'd be nice if there was
On 09/07/2016 08:04 PM, Ye Xiaolong wrote:
On 09/08, Fengguang Wu wrote:
Hi Jens and Tejun,
The command line was in the original email:
$ qemu-system-x86_64 -enable-kvm -cpu Westmere -m 512M
And agree, in general it'd be nice if there was a link to the image as
well, so that folks can
On 09/07/2016 08:04 PM, Ye Xiaolong wrote:
On 09/08, Fengguang Wu wrote:
Hi Jens and Tejun,
The command line was in the original email:
$ qemu-system-x86_64 -enable-kvm -cpu Westmere -m 512M
And agree, in general it'd be nice if there was a link to the image as
well, so that folks can
On 09/08, Fengguang Wu wrote:
>Hi Jens and Tejun,
>
>>The command line was in the original email:
>>
>>$ qemu-system-x86_64 -enable-kvm -cpu Westmere -m 512M
>>
>>And agree, in general it'd be nice if there was a link to the image as
>>well, so that folks can reproduce.
>
>Yes we have a reproduce
On 09/08, Fengguang Wu wrote:
>Hi Jens and Tejun,
>
>>The command line was in the original email:
>>
>>$ qemu-system-x86_64 -enable-kvm -cpu Westmere -m 512M
>>
>>And agree, in general it'd be nice if there was a link to the image as
>>well, so that folks can reproduce.
>
>Yes we have a reproduce
Hi Jens and Tejun,
The command line was in the original email:
$ qemu-system-x86_64 -enable-kvm -cpu Westmere -m 512M
And agree, in general it'd be nice if there was a link to the image as
well, so that folks can reproduce.
Yes we have a reproduce script internally, however need to polish
Hi Jens and Tejun,
The command line was in the original email:
$ qemu-system-x86_64 -enable-kvm -cpu Westmere -m 512M
And agree, in general it'd be nice if there was a link to the image as
well, so that folks can reproduce.
Yes we have a reproduce script internally, however need to polish
On 09/07/2016 10:41 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 06:21:30PM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
FYI, we noticed the following commit:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/axboe/linux-block.git
wb-buf-throttle
commit 8bc4ad9498f81d6689da42457615db0989e720d3 ("writeback:
On 09/07/2016 10:41 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 06:21:30PM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
FYI, we noticed the following commit:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/axboe/linux-block.git
wb-buf-throttle
commit 8bc4ad9498f81d6689da42457615db0989e720d3 ("writeback:
On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 06:21:30PM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
>
> FYI, we noticed the following commit:
>
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/axboe/linux-block.git
> wb-buf-throttle
> commit 8bc4ad9498f81d6689da42457615db0989e720d3 ("writeback: throttle
> buffered
On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 06:21:30PM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
>
> FYI, we noticed the following commit:
>
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/axboe/linux-block.git
> wb-buf-throttle
> commit 8bc4ad9498f81d6689da42457615db0989e720d3 ("writeback: throttle
> buffered
Hello, Paul.
On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 10:00:56AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> Note that lockdep believes that the rcu_read_lock() has also been
> dropped, otherwise it would have listed it.
There isn't any actual code between rcu_read_lock() and the following
rcu deref. That's the first
Hello, Paul.
On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 10:00:56AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> Note that lockdep believes that the rcu_read_lock() has also been
> dropped, otherwise it would have listed it.
There isn't any actual code between rcu_read_lock() and the following
rcu deref. That's the first
On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 09:49:25AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 09/02/2016 09:36 AM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> >On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 10:56:22AM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote:
> >>(cc'ing Paul, hi!)
> >>
> >>Hello,
> >>
> >>On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 02:13:34PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> >>>On 09/01/2016
On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 09:49:25AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 09/02/2016 09:36 AM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> >On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 10:56:22AM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote:
> >>(cc'ing Paul, hi!)
> >>
> >>Hello,
> >>
> >>On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 02:13:34PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> >>>On 09/01/2016
On 09/02/2016 09:36 AM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 10:56:22AM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote:
(cc'ing Paul, hi!)
Hello,
On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 02:13:34PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
On 09/01/2016 04:21 AM, kernel test robot wrote:
[7.323356] cdrom: Uniform CD-ROM driver
On 09/02/2016 09:36 AM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 10:56:22AM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote:
(cc'ing Paul, hi!)
Hello,
On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 02:13:34PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
On 09/01/2016 04:21 AM, kernel test robot wrote:
[7.323356] cdrom: Uniform CD-ROM driver
On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 10:56:22AM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote:
> (cc'ing Paul, hi!)
>
> Hello,
>
> On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 02:13:34PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > On 09/01/2016 04:21 AM, kernel test robot wrote:
> > > [7.323356] cdrom: Uniform CD-ROM driver Revision: 3.20
> > > [7.334239]
>
On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 10:56:22AM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote:
> (cc'ing Paul, hi!)
>
> Hello,
>
> On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 02:13:34PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > On 09/01/2016 04:21 AM, kernel test robot wrote:
> > > [7.323356] cdrom: Uniform CD-ROM driver Revision: 3.20
> > > [7.334239]
>
(cc'ing Paul, hi!)
Hello,
On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 02:13:34PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 09/01/2016 04:21 AM, kernel test robot wrote:
> > [7.323356] cdrom: Uniform CD-ROM driver Revision: 3.20
> > [7.334239]
> > [7.337256] ===
> > [7.340532] [ INFO:
(cc'ing Paul, hi!)
Hello,
On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 02:13:34PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 09/01/2016 04:21 AM, kernel test robot wrote:
> > [7.323356] cdrom: Uniform CD-ROM driver Revision: 3.20
> > [7.334239]
> > [7.337256] ===
> > [7.340532] [ INFO:
On 09/01/2016 04:21 AM, kernel test robot wrote:
FYI, we noticed the following commit:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/axboe/linux-block.git
wb-buf-throttle
commit 8bc4ad9498f81d6689da42457615db0989e720d3 ("writeback: throttle buffered
writeback")
in testcase: boot
on test
On 09/01/2016 04:21 AM, kernel test robot wrote:
FYI, we noticed the following commit:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/axboe/linux-block.git
wb-buf-throttle
commit 8bc4ad9498f81d6689da42457615db0989e720d3 ("writeback: throttle buffered
writeback")
in testcase: boot
on test
24 matches
Mail list logo
