> Everytime a socket is down'd and up'd the logical_packages value increases by
> one, and eventually overflows.
>
> Andi -- I can add this to your patch if you're okay with it.
Sure looks good (minus all the pr_debugs). Thanks for debugging.
-Andi
> Everytime a socket is down'd and up'd the logical_packages value increases by
> one, and eventually overflows.
>
> Andi -- I can add this to your patch if you're okay with it.
Sure looks good (minus all the pr_debugs). Thanks for debugging.
-Andi
On 09/11/2017 07:46 PM, kernel test robot wrote:
> FYI, we noticed the following commit:
>
> commit: 05aa90edc7910ec3d1ed791fa77371b3acb9bf08 ("x86/topology: Avoid
> wasting 128k for package id array")
> url:
>
On 09/11/2017 07:46 PM, kernel test robot wrote:
> FYI, we noticed the following commit:
>
> commit: 05aa90edc7910ec3d1ed791fa77371b3acb9bf08 ("x86/topology: Avoid
> wasting 128k for package id array")
> url:
>
On 09/11/2017 07:46 PM, kernel test robot wrote:
> FYI, we noticed the following commit:
>
> commit: 05aa90edc7910ec3d1ed791fa77371b3acb9bf08 ("x86/topology: Avoid
> wasting 128k for package id array")
> url:
>
On 09/11/2017 07:46 PM, kernel test robot wrote:
> FYI, we noticed the following commit:
>
> commit: 05aa90edc7910ec3d1ed791fa77371b3acb9bf08 ("x86/topology: Avoid
> wasting 128k for package id array")
> url:
>
6 matches
Mail list logo