On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 10:22:26AM -0500, Russell Cattelan wrote:
> .. fs/xfs/Kconfig but using submenu was simply a convince thing
> to group all the XFS options together.
s/convince/convenience/
> If the submenu is really causing people distress go ahead and
> remove it. Since it's a cosmetic
Eric Sandeen wrote:
I have no problem with removing the submenu.
Hm, however, if this is a purely cosmetic thing, let's go all the way
and format the xfs options like the others, with indentation etc:
config XFS_RT
- bool "Realtime support (EXPERIMENTAL)"
+ bool " XFS Realtime
Chris Wedgwood wrote:
On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 10:45:48PM +0200, Jesper Juhl wrote:
It seems slightly odd to me that XFS support should be in a separate
submenu, when all the other filesystems are not using submenus but
are directly selectable from the Filesystems menu.
XFS also has an out-o
On Thu, 2005-08-18 at 06:53 -0700, Chris Wedgwood wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 10:45:48PM +0200, Jesper Juhl wrote:
>
> > It seems slightly odd to me that XFS support should be in a separate
> > submenu, when all the other filesystems are not using submenus but
> > are directly selectable from
4 matches
Mail list logo
