Re: `make checkstack' and cross-compilation

2006-12-06 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
On Tue, 5 Dec 2006, Jeff Dike wrote: > On Fri, Dec 01, 2006 at 05:09:17PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > On Fri, 1 Dec 2006, Jeff Dike wrote: > > > And, do you have a cross-compilation environment which tests this? > > > > Yes :-) > > Can you test this patch? It works for UML and native x8

Re: `make checkstack' and cross-compilation

2006-12-05 Thread Jeff Dike
On Fri, Dec 01, 2006 at 05:09:17PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Fri, 1 Dec 2006, Jeff Dike wrote: > > And, do you have a cross-compilation environment which tests this? > > Yes :-) Can you test this patch? It works for UML and native x86_64 - if it works for your cross-build, I'll send

Re: `make checkstack' and cross-compilation

2006-12-01 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
On Fri, 1 Dec 2006, Jeff Dike wrote: > On Fri, Dec 01, 2006 at 02:58:16PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > Makefile has: > > | # Use $(SUBARCH) here instead of $(ARCH) so that this works for UML. > > | # In the UML case, $(SUBARCH) is the name of the underlying > > | # architecture, while for a

Re: `make checkstack' and cross-compilation

2006-12-01 Thread Jeff Dike
On Fri, Dec 01, 2006 at 02:58:16PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > Makefile has: > | # Use $(SUBARCH) here instead of $(ARCH) so that this works for UML. > | # In the UML case, $(SUBARCH) is the name of the underlying > | # architecture, while for all other arches, it is the same as $(ARCH). > |

`make checkstack' and cross-compilation

2006-12-01 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
Makefile has: | # Use $(SUBARCH) here instead of $(ARCH) so that this works for UML. | # In the UML case, $(SUBARCH) is the name of the underlying | # architecture, while for all other arches, it is the same as $(ARCH). | checkstack: | $(OBJDUMP) -d vmlinux $$(find . -name '*.ko') | \ |